this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
70 points (96.1% liked)

Privacy

34526 readers
668 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think those websites are over using trackers in their websites for extra profit with no care for the privacy of their users, I highly recommend avoiding them.

For comparsion:

Update: added Wired and more websites for comparison.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] timmytbt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

I was a Guardian subscriber for a while until I looked at their “partners” that they were sharing my data with through the app.

[–] hactar42@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

You gotta pump those numbers up, those are rookie number - Forbes

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You can use their RSS feeds to avoid a lot of their tracking.

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

All news sites should be consumed via RSS. Their front pages are the equivalent of social media algorithms and you only see what they want to show you. When you use RSS you get a list of news in time order and see news stories you would never see on their website because of how fast they drop it from their front page and bury it in menus.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Viewing through archive.is is another great option too for bypassing paywalls.

[–] skribe@aussie.zone 21 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

You can read most of The Guardian without JavaScript.

[–] Tea@programming.dev 8 points 17 hours ago

You can read the other websites without JavaScript as well.

Also, that might not stop all the trackers, as the webpages are loaded with their trackers.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 4 points 16 hours ago

I read it on terminal

[–] Andrew@mnstdn.monster 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

From Europe they're actually better than the other news sites you list here. Either way, I'm using ad-blocking, DNS filtering, and I do general browsing like this in a separate browser that wipes everything on exit sooo 🤷 saves you from worrying about this stuff or even thinking about it much.

[–] Tea@programming.dev -2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

2 things:

they're actually better than the other news sites you list here.

What you are saying does not make any sense unless you did not click the links to see the amount of trackers in the tests.

Either way, I'm using ad-blocking, DNS filtering, and I do general browsing like this in a separate browser that wipes everything on exit sooo 🤷 saves you from worrying about this stuff or even thinking about it much.

Yet you are using Lemmy instead of Reddit? Which means you kind of understand fully that the tools that you are talking about does not protect you 100% , rather they just reduce the amount of trackers tracking you.

Also it's pretty dystopian to support the websites that violates people privacy, instead of using the websites that basically provide the same product with better privacy.

[–] Andrew@mnstdn.monster 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I in fact DID click the links and change the filters on the tool to test the europe sites. Try it yourself next time.

And sorry but no, the Guardian, The Verge, and AP news, etc do not provide the same products. I simply choose to accept the reality we live in and deal with it.