KDE is an international technology team creating user-friendly free and open source software for desktop and portable computing. KDE’s software runs on GNU/Linux, BSD and other operating systems, including Windows.
If you encounter a bug, proceed to https://bugs.kde.org/, check whether it has been reported.
If it hasn't, report it yourself.
PLEASE THINK CAREFULLY BEFORE POSTING HERE.
Developers do not look for reports on social media, so they will not see it and all it does is clutter up the feed.
digiKam, KDE's full-featured photo management software, releases version 8.6.0.
You can look forward to a smarter face management tool, an improved auto-tagging system that identifies elements in your images, fully automatic red-eye removal, and a new image quality feature that classifies images according to their aesthetic quality.
We also fixed 140 bugs!
https://www.digikam.org/news/2025-03-15-8.6.0/_release/_announcement/
I have used digiKam for years on Windows, it is great!
I often export HTML photo galleries and upload to a private web hotel where I build a pretty Index page in HTML and CSS, everything is blazingly fast.
Sure.
My setup is technically horrible.
All my personal photos are stored on a single mechanical hard drive in my computer.
There are zero backups apart from an old Intel NAS that I keep as a cold backup of most of my other media, it has not been updated in several years, and has old drives that was used when I got it more then a decade ago.
What I am trying to say is that while my setup might seem nice, it is awful.
I have thought about getting a NAS for years and one day I will wake up and start blasting the Scorpion song Someday Is Now, and as the blood rains down across the tundra, my feet will rain down on the sidewalk on Sveavägen as I go and buy a NAS.
Anyway, take my technical setup as a warning on what not to do even though it is possible.
So yeah, my setup is pretty basic, I have a Windows 10 machine (which I may try and migrate to Linux as October gets closer....), I run digiKam 7.3.0 IIRC, digiKam uses a root folder on a single HDD as a library folder.
In the Library folder I have a folder structure like this
..//<LOCATION/EVENT> /
Example:
../2024/Arlanda 4 2024/
This is an ok system that works for me, it almost mirrors the standard I used when naming photos I uploaded to deviantArt, then I added another serialnumber to the end.
I use a Lumix S5 camera, and have it set to save both HQ JPEG and RAW, I am planning on adding a Sony A7 IV and a few lenses more to my collection.
digiKam handles Lumix RAW files fine
Yeah, I have friends, but not IT savy friends who I would trust could keep a system exposed to the internet updated, I am an IT guy, I don't want to be responsible for keeping their system updated, or be the guy who punched a hole in their firewall if they get hit by a zero day.
@stoy and what do you use to generate the html pages from your digikam photos?
Sorry about leaving you hanging, I fell asleep.
Yeah, exporting galleries in digiKam, you get several options for theming and other settings.
You simply select the phots in a folder, in the order you want them, run the wizard in digiKam and bam, you have an HTML gallery that is fast and simple to navigate.
How many photos do you manage? I have... a lot.
My personal photo collection is 1TB with 66185 files....
I am a hobby photographer and last year I captured about 14500 pictures
Good to hear. I'm in the same ballpark, so if you're happy with it, I will be too. Thanks.
Just trying it and wow, the speed improvement of face detection is amazing! Also I feel like it's more accurate but I need to play with it more
@kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social We had a look at Digikam last year, but then noticed that it had written to our original files when photos were rotated, etc
Which for me was totally unacceptable. Obviously it wasn't used again after that.
Did we do something wrong, or is that the way it works?
It's a configuration option.
@ada OK. Guess we should have an other look then, but on a copy of part of our photos.
Last year I noticed that Digikam had written to our photo library when manually updating the external backups.
Jacqueline thinks she had checked all config settings.
Thanks for the reply.
There's a couple of different options in there, both in the Metadata section of the preferences One, is the option to use sidecar files, and you can explicitly tell it use sidecar files for everything and don't write to the original file. Beside the sidecar tab, there is another tab that lets you control how it handles image rotation, and whether it adjusts the pixels, or just sets a metadata flag
@kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social Wow, first time hearing about this project, but sounds really interesting.
@kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social @nicemicro@fosstodon.org just found out about it thru this post.looking forward to the sync since my camera is compatible
@kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social
I have tested the AppImage. After the installation it informs that the face image database is outdated and suggest updating it. This will fail, because the old models get removed for the newer. It will crash. Therefore, after the first start cancel this database update, download the models, restart the app, and it will just work.