this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2567 readers
617 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] goldfish_brain@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact, it’s not illegal to refuse an illegal order from the president, but it IS illegal to refuse any judicial order even if it’s ultimately deemed illegal.

Not that the law matters anymore, of course.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago

Yea. Amy order from a judge is deemed to be legal.

On the other hand, in extreme cases, I'd hope they ignore the judges order to massacre the village.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So, did we cross the Constitutional Crisis Rubicon when Trump ignored the judicial order?

[–] numbermess@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The answer is of course yes, but I don't think it's really from a line that we crossed. It's more like saturation. They are not a vanguard of this lawlessness, they are more like a pressure that is infusing it into all systems all at once. They are a swarm.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah... the floodwaters have surged and it's sort of rushing over lawfulness with abandon. I really like this analogy - thanks.