this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
24 points (96.2% liked)

AskUSA

447 readers
22 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

  1. !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
  2. !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

  1. Be nice or gtfo
  2. Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
  3. Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

  1. !askuk@feddit.uk
  2. !casualuk@feddit.uk
  3. !casualconversation@lemm.ee
  4. !yurop@lemm.ee
  5. !esp@lemm.ee

Related communities

  1. !asklemmy@lemmy.world
  2. !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
  3. !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
  4. !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
  5. !usa@ponder.cat

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

My guess is cry and not much more.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You really think? I think they are all talk. Look how the second ammendment" people act when their rights are being taken away.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

The guy that beat Paul Pelosi with a hammer wasn’t all talk. They’re out there, acting on their interpretation of Trump’s will. Honestly reminds me a lot of the zealots in imperial Japan. Junior officers would assassinate officers with opposing views to theirs as they believed that they “understood the emperor’s will” better than their enemies. This gave them enough mental leeway to act unilaterally (or in a small cell).

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Only a small portion of them need to be violent to cause problems. Like a few thousand out of the tens of millions of maga voters killing or attempting to kill politicians or the people they hate would be enough to lead to far bigger problems than the failed Jan 6th insurrection. It would likely to be used to justify martial law.

[–] afronaut@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We could see copycat versions of Jan. 6th happening in various red states. More right-wing accelerationism for sure. Will that include violence? I mean, we’ve already seen them commit it before. Things are going to get much worse. The worst part is, even if the Republican Party “stops” MAGA, we are still being lead by the Party that allowed MAGA to take power in the first place. They will capitalize on the right-wing violence to push more police and military presence anyway which will largely be used against leftists.

[–] 00daen@crazypeople.online 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I feel every thing you said is absolutely correct apart from the "largely used against leftists." There will be no face left uneaten by leopards. Once the minority has control they will stomp EVERYONE to keep power and live luxurious lives.

[–] afronaut@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 hours ago

What I meant was that any right-wing or state violence will be attributed to leftists as a scapegoat. It will allow them to stomp on everyone while displacing the blame onto a convenient target.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 4 points 1 day ago

This is generally the sort of question that's more appropriate for !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or other communities. It's more a question about the nitty gritty of politics, as opposed to a more specific question (Are you worried about what MAGA will do if ...?) or a more general ask (How does the history of fascism in the US apply to today?).

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I’m pretty sure all the republicans in congress are MAGA