this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
-13 points (36.2% liked)

Privacy

1606 readers
493 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote big-tech software.
  5. No reposting of news that was already posted. Even from different sources.
  6. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  7. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)

Related communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/31525284

Archived

[...]

While the financial, economic, technological, and national-security implications of DeepSeek’s achievement have been widely covered, there has been little discussion of its significance for authoritarian governance. DeepSeek has massive potential to enhance China’s already pervasive surveillance state, and it will bring the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) closer than ever to its goal of possessing an automated, autonomous, and scientific tool for repressing its people.

Since its inception in the early 2000s, the Chinese surveillance state has undergone three evolutions. In the first, which lasted until the early 2010s, the CCP obtained situational awareness — knowledge of its citizens’ locations and behaviors — via intelligent-monitoring technology. In the second evolution, from the mid-2010s till now, AI systems began offering authorities some decision-making support. Today, we are on the cusp of a third transformation that will allow the CCP to use generative AI’s emerging reasoning capabilities to automate surveillance and hone repression.

[...]

China’s surveillance-industrial complex took a big leap in the mid-2010s. Now, AI-powered surveillance networks could do more than help the CCP to track the whereabouts of citizens (the chess pawns). It could also suggest to the party which moves to make, which figures to use, and what strategies to take.

[...]

Inside China, such a network of large-scale AGI [artificial general intelligence] systems could autonomously improve repression in real time, rooting out the possibility of civic action in urban metropolises. Outside the country, if cities such as Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia — where China first exported Alibaba’s City Brain system in 2018 — were either run by a Chinese-developed city brain that had reached AGI or plugged into a Chinese city-brain network, they would quietly lose their governance autonomy to these highly complex systems that were devised to achieve CCP urban-governance goals.

[...]

As China’s surveillance state begins its third evolution, the technology is beginning to shift from merely providing decision-making support to actually acting on the CCP’s behalf.

[...]

DeepSeek [...] is this technology that would, for example, allow a self-driving car to recognize road signs even on a street it had never traveled before. [...] The advent of DeepSeek has already impelled tech experts in the United States to take similar approaches. Researchers at Stanford University managed to produce a powerful AI system for under US$50, training it on Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental. By driving down the cost of LLMs, including for security purposes, DeepSeek will thus enable the proliferation of advanced AI and accelerate the rollout of Chinese surveillance infrastructure globally.

[...]

The next step in the evolution of China’s surveillance state will be to integrate generative-AI models like DeepSeek into urban surveillance infrastructures. Lenovo, a Hong Kong corporation with headquarters in Beijing, is already rolling out programs that fuse LLMs with public-surveillance systems. In Barcelona, the company is administering its Visual Insights Network for AI (VINA), which allows law enforcement and city-management personnel to search and summarize large amounts of video footage instantaneously.

[...]

The CCP, with its vast access to the data of China-based companies, could use DeepSeek to enforce laws and intimidate adversaries in myriad ways — for example, deploying AI police agents to cancel a Lunar New Year holiday trip planned by someone required by the state to stay within a geofenced area; or telephoning activists after a protest to warn of the consequences of joining future demonstrations. It could also save police officers’ time. Rather than issuing “invitations to tea” (a euphemism for questioning), AI agents could conduct phone interviews and analyze suspects’ voices and emotional cues for signs of repentance.

[...]

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] viking@infosec.pub 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Deepseek is no more or less restrictive than ChatGPT, and the American clowns are also threatening democracy. So I don't see any reason to avoid one over the other. Unless you refuse to use both, that's just hypocrisy.

[–] stm@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just a clash of big powers. For me I don't care if it meta or tiktok spying, nor if it's censored by US or China.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Its going to china anyway.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

All I see here is a Public Relations.

I refuse to use any AI. I know better. Not that it'll make a difference for Terminator.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Last I checked, you could run DeepSeek locally and without an internet connection, the same can't be said for Gemini, ChatGPT or the biggest western ones. I'm all for highlighting privacy issues, but while ignoring the massive issues of western AI, looks like you're really just peddling racism.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The real kicker with deepseek is not its ties to China but that it is coded in a way that makes much better use of resources than anything the Silicon valley tech bros have achieved so far. By orders of magnitude.

Deepseek is opensource (according to Ed Zitron whom I trust with such things).
The data it (I guess the publicly available instance located in China?) has been fed on is not.
You can build your own DeepSeek and feed it whatever you want. Fully transparent, no ties to China.

I did not read this article, but the blurb above just assumes that DeepSeek has ties to the Regime. Which isn't a wrong assumption per se, but it's still a claim that needs to be backed with something. Without that it sounds suspiciously like the FUD said tech bros have been sowing for a while now, shitting their pants about their next government subsidy.

That said, there's a very simple solution to ALL of that "controversy": don't use A-not-I.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Is deepseek, the trained model being offered to people, a privacy risk? I'm guessing it is, but I could be wrong.

[–] Hotznplotzn -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I did not read this article, but ...

Classic.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

... the blurb

Why did you provide a long summary if you're going to ridicule people who didn't click on the link?

Also, I should have written "I did not read this article, but did read others"

I was giving you the benefit even though I've noticed before that you post stuff I ... find problematic, but this is just classic troll behavior.

[–] Ilixtze@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

China Makes open source ai; BUT AT WHAT COST?!

[–] alykanas@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What have you got against China ? Almost every post in your account is anti China news .

There’s clearly a bias

[–] Hotznplotzn -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am not 'anti-China,' and I post about a lot of issues from reliable and very good sources.

[–] alykanas@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You have made over 20 posts to Lemmy in the last 3 days. They are all negative news from China, posted across Lemmy, to communities that you do not otherwise participate in.

It’s impossible to argue that you are not anti China.

But why ?

[–] Hotznplotzn -4 points 4 days ago

I am not anti-China. These are valid posts from reliable sources. The Chinese propaganda is in other communities.

[–] Hotznplotzn -3 points 4 days ago

A study from EnkryptAI (pdf) confirms that DeepSeek is prone to delivering misinformation and harmful content. It claims that the model is:

  • 3x more biased than Claude-3 Opus
  • 4x more vulnerable to generating insecure code than OpenAI’s O1
  • 4x more toxic than GPT-4o
  • 11x more likely to generate harmful output versus OpenAI O1
  • 3.5x more likely to produce Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) content​ than OpenAI O1 and Claude-3 Opus