A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
Related communities:
Rhetorical, just FYI. I’m an American in Germany and I’ve literally never met a native German speaker who wasn’t a linguistics professor who didn’t say “rethoric” though, so it’s not a big mistake at all. I do wonder if there was a misprint in a popular textbook or something though, because it’s weirdly consistent, even more so than I would expect from a word with a silent (in German) h somewhere.
It's a lot more unusual to have an h after an r than an h after a t, even in German. So if you vaguely remember there's supposed to be an h somewhere, it intuitively makes more sense after the t.
In German, "th" is uncommon (non-existent?) in words that aren't overtly borrowed from Latin/Greek, so you get overcompensation like "Ethymologie". "Rhythmus" trips me up every time.
non-american here, what is an "alien" in this context? i imagine it doesn't mean "extraterrestrial"
edit: actually nvm, i just searched it up. why are people being called aliens? does this word even fit that role?
I think it's the original definition of the word alien, but I might be wrong. Kinda derogatory now but still used in legal contexts
I'm an alien, I'm a legal alien. I'm an Englishman in New York
Are you the guy Sting wrote the song about?
Nope. I like my toast done on both sides.
yes it's the appropriate term with the same meaning dating back to its original latin meaning, well before the concept of extraterrestrials
Where did you think the scifi term alien came from?
It just means foreigner, people will even use it as a verb
Something is alien (unknown) to me
Alienate is to exclude
Comes from here https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/alienus#Latin
I get their thought process. To them, the constitution applies only to US citizens. They are stupid fucks for sure, but I get it.
Isn't that the entire thought process behind Guantanamo? The constitution applies in the us, move them outside our borders and we can do whatever we want. By the same logic, the constitution applies to citizens (when on us soil), not a citizen, no constitutional protections.
To be clear, I'm entirely against this, and I don't think that's actually how our laws work, just furthering your point of understanding how the stupid fucks get there. The US has been skirting it's own laws and letter-of-the-lawing it to get around whatever it doesn't like + outright ignoring and violating our own laws when it suits us for so long that who the fuck knows what they'll do, and how they'll justify it, and who can blame a MAGAt for not knowing how it actually works
I mean the us has never followed due process in the way advocates frame it. As well as this originalists like Thomas and Scalia have always opposed it. Look at dred scott for a history of this. Even in theory due process is not the greatest. This person is wrong and almost certainly extremely bigoted but not as " out there" as some of these comments think.
All she cares about it herself
This is why US concentration camps are in Guntanamo Bay and El Salvador