this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

1495 readers
12 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] glebyglobster@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

It would be a much better world

[–] alykanas@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 days ago

Everyone would be happier

You would need to make illegal both advertising and the associated spyware and data collection infrastructure.

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It sounds like a good idea, but I’m not sure how efficiently it could be enforced. If a photo of someone wearing a certain brand of clothes is in a news article, does that count as advertising for that clothing brand? What if the news article goes viral?

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

I'm mainly concerned with paid for, intentional advertising, but yes, if there's an obvious brand logo in a news article's image, then it should be censored in some way, even if it's just blurred out.

[–] Sinaf@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I'd also think it would be better to create rules and regulations that are as clear cut as possible and almost impossible to circumvent.

Go after billboards first. I can turn off the TV and avoid websites that have too many ads. I should be able to ignore advertisements in the public space. Clear size limits, don't allow structures that will only be used for this specific purpose, etc.