this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
53 points (96.5% liked)

Hardware

1497 readers
138 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world
Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee
53
The Great NVIDIA Switcheroo | GPU Shrinkflation. (gamersnexus.net)
submitted 6 days ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/hardware@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We look at how NVIDIA has downsized essentially all of its gaming GPUs in terms of relative configuration compared to each generation’s flagship

  • This article expands upon our "RTX 4080 problem" by looking at the entirety of the RTX 50 series, including how the RTX 5070 looks an awful lot like a prior 50-class or 60-class GPU.
  • NVIDIA is giving you the least amount of CUDA cores for a given class of GPU than ever before.
  • GPU prices have crept higher across the board, but NVIDIA's, in particular, have lost step with what we came to expect from generations of GPU launches.
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Money shot:

Zooming back out, we think the overall picture is clear. NVIDIA has downsized essentially all of its gaming GPUs in terms of relative configuration compared to each generation’s flagship. All of the lines go down. The chart from earlier had a lot of words to say one thing: Line go down = bad. We don’t want the line to go down. We want the line to stay the same or go up.

The 80 class is now in line with former 70 class GPUs and the 70 Ti/Super class is now in line with former 60 Ti class territory. The last 60 class card was configured like a 50-class of yore.

For Nvidia gaming is now just an annoying side project that they have to keep up with to maintain their Plan B scenario. They are a highly sophisticated organization, somewhere in their internal analysis there is a scenario that covers a significant decline in "AI" GPU revenues.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Sadly, this is also coupled with a price increase on the downsized cards too, so we are double screwed.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 2 points 4 days ago

I miss the old Nvidia, the one making the 900 and 10 series cards. You got an amazing GPU at reasonable prices, everything less than $800.

Nowadays, I feel like the market has deteriorated on Nvidia's end. Idgaf about the eight games with Some anemic raytracing overlays. I want good raster performance at 4k 120, good physics performance,and a good price.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

On one hand I agree with GamersNexus Steve that 'line go down = bad,' but on the other hand you could consider it as the flagship becoming more and more of an outlier. (In other words, if the graph were normalized such that the 80 series line were flat, then I think the lower-model lines would also be flat but the 90 series line would be going up.)

If Nvidia "fixed" it by just not offering the 5090 in its current form at all and instead having the fastest non-pro/compute/AI card be one with a lower price and fewer cores, would that make Steve and gamers happy?

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

This is true. But it also ignores price dynamics.

One of the first GPUs that I "bought" (convinced my father to pay for an upgrade) was the GeForce 6600 for ~$250 or so (maybe $275 max) in 2004. This is the true price, not American-style list price. We bought it for that price (in local currency) at a computer store. I believe US true prices were (much?) lower that $275 at that time, but I could be wrong.

$275 in 2004 is around $470 in 2025. You are not getting a Nvidia 6600 class card for $470 (all in) from AMD or Nvidia. The closest would be the Intel B580 which goes for around $340 (true price) where I live. But I would argue the B580 is not comparable to what the 6600 was in 2004. And the 6600 was broadly available in 2004 (at relatively competitive prices) even though I did not live in the "western world".

And keep in mind that I don't remember the exact price of the 6600 that we bought in 2004. My memory tells me that it was around $250 which would be $420 is current dollars (solid price difference to the $470 mentioned earlier).