this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3015 readers
954 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The answer is fucking no, obviously.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it were obvious to them, they wouldn't be hearing arguments.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, cause they need to figure out how to get Trump what he wants even though it's clearly dead-brained as fuck.

Yes, that's what I'm saying.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

feel like this is the first headline I've seen to use "oral arguments"

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That supreme court vernacular. There are many written arguments made prior to the case being heard, then they "hear oral arguments" in court before making a ruling.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago