chuckleslord

joined 2 years ago
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Yeah, all those times he advocates for the end of wars. Extreme bloodthirst, that Hasan, not wanting children to be killed.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's stupid bullshit. He's just pandering with no actual idea or anything of value to contribute.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I suggest that really big cannon y'all invented in WW2. That'll put them right where they're supposed to be

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a cube

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Or... we shouldn't have a pass/fail on people being able to live happily on earth. We have more than enough for everyone to live.

Like yeah, individuals should look for ways to improve their scenarios since often the system isn't willing to help, but it shouldn't be the first solution for others to look for.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Umm...

Seizure warning

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

It's why the US has St Patrick's Day and Christopher Columbus Day. They needed to prove their worth to earn "whiteness"

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Yours will be the ~~drill~~ tank that pierces the heavens!

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I absolutely love this reply to my joke answer

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

White supremacist made by neo-nazis in Silicon Valley into the "perfect" politician. One who follows orders and doesn't question. Real spineless piece of shit. Likes to fuck couches. Killed the pope.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

This is the actual reason why it is capitalism and not any individual players that must be ultimately held at fault. Even if every company from now on acted in the best interests of humanity/ workers, they'd be sued for failing to produce the amount of profits required by shareholders. They literally have to act like unrepentant sociopaths for them to stay in business.

 

I don't care if it's in a shitposting community, a meme community, or a news community. If the image or text is generated it should be labeled as such, and failing to label it should be grounds to remove the post. AI slop is a plague and its only going to get worse as the tech matures (if it hasn't already peaked).

I'm so tired of having to call it out every time I see it, especially when people in the comments think it's a photoshop work or (heavens help us) real. Human labor has real tangible value that plagiarism machines can't even pretend to imitate and I'm sick of seeing that shit without it being labeled (so I can filter it out).

 

No idea what's going on here, but figured I'd record it happening. Happened after scrolling past a post and then going back up.

 

Before downvoting, check the community.

If you fail to use the /s tag or specifically call out that your comment is sarcastic, I'm going to treat it as being earnest. I might ask if you're being sarcastic, but I will downvote as though you are being earnest.

The /s tag not only clarifies, but it also confirms that you're being sarcastic. A thing you cannot ordinarily convey via written text unless you specifically call it out. You can hint at it, readers can infer it, but you cannot convey it. To convey it, sans directly stating it, you would need to include a recording of you speaking the comment, which defeats the whole point of text chats.

"It definitely reads as sarcasm, you're just missing it" So what? I'm neurodivergent. I barely get this shit in its normal, spoken context. Why should I be expected to understand the implied sarcasm in your text comment?

"Telling someone you're being sarcastic ruins it" Unless your definition of sarcasm is just lying to someone's face, you do indicate sarcasm when speaking. Via the exaggerated, deadpan tone you use. Something you can't convey in written text unless you specifically call it out.

"I made it very clear via hyperbole that it was sarcasm" Have you talked to people? Your obvious, over-the-top, hyperbolic sarcasm could just be someone's opinion taken whole cloth. In fact, you probably modeled your exaggeration AFTER a person. Can you see why, if I don't know you, there's no way to tell?

"I forgot the tag" cool, if I see the edit adding it back in, I'll revert my downvote. Consider it the opportunity cost of forgetting.

"It doesn't hurt anyone" Yes, it does. You give credence to your exaggerated position that you would never take because the people who think like that exaggerated position will point to your comment as proof that they have support. It's why 4chan rebirthed nazism.

"I still won't do it". Then have fun with the downvote. You want to make the internet worse? I'll be sure that you don't get the internet points your brain craves.

 
view more: next ›