Gonna go with no.
chuckleslord
The Hogfather
... is this a deep cut? Only time will tell
When developing code for first release, we had a dedicated HIP Sprint (Hardening, Innovation, Planning) and we had the most productive team in the company. Other teams were struggling cause they were just using the HIP as another Sprint. So what did we do? Got rid of the HIP, naturally. You see, some teams weren't using it and it's unfair to those teams that we're not doing work when they are. Now everyone's suffering!
Also had legitimate agile practices (budgets are for HR, work on what you need to work on and let someone else worry about paying for it) and we were the most productive team in the company. So, naturally, they need to get a bunch of C-suite guys to come over and run things cause it would be really embarrassing for them if they weren't involved in the new hotness. Naturally, though, we gotta go back to funding buckets, cause those c-suite guys don't understand why they got to talk to the developers when they want something fixed instead of handing things down from on high. Oh no! Suddenly all these issues are popping up in the workflow, guess we gotta force in ai to fix the problems.
Oh, no, yeah, no, yeah, for sure. Just explaining why we missed the bus on the social safety net movement from Europe.
It's also when conservative think tanks came online. It's not Reagan, it's what Reagan was being told to do by "think tanks"
Oh fuck yeah
BHJ is absurdist. It looks at the image and gives description or dialogue based solely on what's in the image, with no care for what the original context is.
Anti-memes are in conversation with the original meme, but subvert expectations by changing up the punchline to something more literal. Or in the case of your meme, a reference to another joke.
BHJ for this comic
"AI is the most important undertaking this company has ever undertaken. Tell me your AI stories"
"I haven't gotten around to using it"
"I use it for emails"
"Fucking clankers stole my face and gave me a robot one. Can't even eat. Thinking about jumping out the window"
EU's stated reason for abstaining is
1, use of superlatives
2, bias in presentation, against UN charter
3, they're against reparations
I dunno man, it really just smells like they don't want to pay up for their crimes against humanity. When your first two points are nit picking and your last one is "and we were told we wouldn't have to answer for shitty things before we made rules about it", it's kinda giving away why you're against it.
Explain?
Gross. And sad.