Firefox

20333 readers

37 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

BrowserAudit has less warnings for my Firefox setup vs. out of the box Tor Browser (browseraudit.com)

submitted 2 months ago by thingsiplay@beehaw.org to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://browseraudit.com/

I just downloaded Tor browser (which is a configured Firefox browser BTW) using the torbrowser-launcher that automatically downloads and manages the browser. And I thought for funs sake, checking and comparing some tests from browseraudit against my current personal Firefox setup. And to my surprise I got more warnings with Tor Browser v14.5 (based on Mozilla Firefox 128.9.0esr) vs My personal setup of Firefox Browser v137.0.2 (custom configurations and plugins installed). Both at the most up to date version in their official version.

I just found this interesting and wanted to share with you.

Tor Browser

My Firefox Browser

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

The thing you should be aware of is that Tor is designed to make you look uniform to every other Tor browser. It's set such that you should not really stand out from other Tor users by browser fingerprinting techniques.

Without showing us what the differing warnings are, it's hard to even assess what this information means.

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

what additional warnings were issued in tor browser?