this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
1453 points (98.4% liked)

Facepalm

3332 readers
89 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TranscriptA threads post saying "There has never been another nation ever that has existed much beyond 250 years. Not a single one. America's 250th year is 2025. The next 4 years are gonna be pretty interesting considering everything that's already been said." It has a reply saying "My local pub is older than your country".

Edit: swapped image link, RIP lemm.ee

Original link: https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/b4d2f599-1922-4978-9db3-fc7832681c10.png

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I dunno, I'm pretty sure Japan is older.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Depends what you define as nation. Modern day Japan is only 157 years old since the Meiji Restoration started in 1868.

Like the US will still exist after the American empire collapses but sure as hell not in it’s current form.

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 10 points 2 months ago

I don't consider different eras as different nations though. I think that's splitting too many hairs. I see a nation as a country that is generally united and governed by a leading entity.

Going back to the Japan example, I would consider them a nation when all the clans were united under one rule. Same with UK, India, Thailand etc.

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Then the US can only count since the civil war 🤷‍♂️ Or maybe since Hawaii's invasion (1959).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

Even if this were true, this would be anthropic reasoning, which is always suspect. The belief that the present, the here and now, cannot be exceptional will always overlook examples where it is exceptional.

We live in interesting times.

[–] Matombo@feddit.org 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

i think the first poster misunderstood a quote and I can't reproduce it anymore either. it was something about no empire lasted more then 250 years? or no government form or something among these lines? it was not about the country disapearing in name or anything, but that it damatically changes in one way or another like completly changing the form of government

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 12 points 2 months ago (5 children)

This isn't a facepalm. As any red-blooded American knows, the only country worth mentioning is America. Since all countries of note were founded after America, this OP is correct.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

My country is 900 years old and my people has inhabited these lands before the romans ever dreamed of set foot here.

That is plain ignorance.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

I believe the ottoman empire (1299–1922) would like a word.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 10 points 2 months ago

It probably has a more stable foundation too!

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

How many different countries has your pub survived?

[–] ndupont@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Remember the time we stumbled on an old local church with an American coworker. Yes dude, that thing was over 500 years old when Columbus discovered your continent, allegedly.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

England would like a word. It formed in 927 AD. That means it is 1,098 years old.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›