this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Physics

1641 readers
6 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wigners_friend@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But there's nothing interesting in the quantum Cheshire cat, just fuss and noise because people don't understand conditional probabilities. So the "quantum eraser" all over again.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why is the particle dissociating from its properties not interesting?

[–] Wigners_friend@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If that were actually happening it would be astounding. But they never measure the particle in one arm and the spin in the other in the same run. They conduct different experiments for the two results. The two experiments have different conditional probabilities. In the first run the particle can only be in one arm of the experiment. The changes made for the "grin" experiment break this condition though. So the particle can be in the same place as the "grin". In short, there is no evidence the property was dissociated.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago

This is want I thought when reading the article.

There will have to be a lot more proof, before I can accept this.

Extraordinary claims and all that...

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago

This is quite impressive, especially since we're talking about the real world. This isn't in the realm of ideas anymore.