this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
39 points (89.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6604 readers
477 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Because relentless bad news breeds cynicism, which is demoralizing and self-defeating. In this community there's already plenty of that to go round. The full story is slightly more complex.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solo@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Economic growth makes us all better,

No. Economic growth under capitalism is the problem. Capitalism requires infinite growth on a finite planet, and this is what got us here in the first place. So this is not a sustainable economic system.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Completely agree. That one was a terrible take.

Growthism is a de-facto religion IMO. The obsession with this weirdly abstract indicator is obviously irrational.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

In a liberal democracy, it hypothetically should allow for increased economic mobility, by making "new money" available to people to make their riches. As others have said, this is unsustainable in a finite system.

Another way to allow for economic mobility is to free up some of the "old money" back into the economy.

There are many ways to accomplish this.

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

"Infinite growth is not sustainable in any natural system" is a daily mantra for me.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Figuring out that many crops do better underneath solar panels should make a big difference as it catches on.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaics

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yep I learned about that too recently. Encouraging.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago