this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
65 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

2885 readers
178 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

LegoGPT generates a LEGO structure from a user-provided text prompt in an end-to-end manner. Notably, our generated LEGO structure is physically stable and buildable.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 17 points 3 weeks ago

This is how AI should be used. this idea of throwing everything at it but the kitchen sink is a big mistake. The most successful things will come out of training to do something specific on the highest quality data they can get. Less bad data percent will win over total data amount.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

They're just built with 1 by X bricks. But I kinda like that, it's not replacing anything a person would design. I think I'd prefer a program that would take a 3d model as in input instead of a text prompt, but both are cool.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Finally a real-world use-case for AI!

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

OK, while I am generally against AI, this is awesome

[–] rmic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's awesome in one hand, but on the other it removes a lot of the frenzy creativity fun

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

How long until AGI and we don't need separate models for every single thing?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody can tell you, and if they say they do know, they’re selling snake oil.

But when it happens, shit is going to change fast, for better or for worse.

[–] executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

When

Just not soon

[–] mj_marathon@programming.dev 7 points 3 weeks ago

Potentially never

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

A pretty long time.

Niche models are tons of fun though.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know for sure, but right now we're in a very early version of an AGI with limitations, but it's only available to users who pay a subscription.

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Tool use/mcp can do an awful lot already, not everything but it’s hard to come up with stuff it just plain can't do.

Agi is poorly defined, without a clear definition of exactly what it is there will never be a time we actually achieve it because the goalposts will move.

We all probably remember the time that the turing test was the ultimate test of an ai, but that's pretty well cooked and it no longer matters at all.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

AGI has always had a same definition: general intelligence, when an AI can do anything a human brain could.

[–] kevin2107@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Don't see how that's not the case now. Only thing missing is a universal harness, which it'll probably be able to build itself soon, for sure humans can't.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fuckin nice!