this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

2558 readers
133 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One dollar per terabyte. Wow. I still remember spending about 300 dollars (back then) on a 40 megabyte disk...

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The HDD in our first family computer had 1.5 GB. This was at the end of 1996.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I had a 5 megabyte HD once (given to me for my experiments), but the smallest I actually used was a 20 megabyte one, for which I designed the controller interface. And that was already on my third computer. Before that, it was casette tape (TI99/4A) and 5.25in 170 kilobyte floppy disk (C64).

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This seems cool if it works.

I wonder if read speeds will be good enough to use them as primary storage or if these will only be good for archival

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Write once?