this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
19 points (77.1% liked)

ChatGPT

9722 readers
3 users here now

Unofficial ChatGPT community to discuss anything ChatGPT

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Veo 3

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CombatWombat1212@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 weeks ago

I don't want to live on this planet anymore man. Holy fuck we're just watching creativity die.

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

That looks cool, but maybe not $250 a month cool.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago

Given you would need to pay actors and a production team to do this conventionally, $250/m is massively undercutting the cost of a human created equivalent.

Even if this produces shit half the time, there's enough greedy marketing agency owners out there that will be thinking they can save tens of thousands a month in salary by gutting their video production teams

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Lol, you think this is for the poors, this is so one business man in an office in Tahiti can generate infinite videos and finally monopolize the welth of the content creators into the billionaire class

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Cherrypicked and even these have issues.

It is progress I guess.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Less than two years ago AI couldn't make an image of a person with the right amount of fingers.

Now we are here. In two years AI video could produce a TV show or movie.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It was fast, for sure, but tv shows in two years are very unlikely. If we could get at least more consistent results and better character control, that would already be a lot

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

AI has been able to make pictures with the right amount of fingers for about four years. It involved cherry picking and sometimes inpainting. The biggest thing that’s changed is resolution and prompt adherence.

Even the best models sometimes (frequently) give people extra fingers.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Seems to be the most lucrative also.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

It will be funny when someone maps this to the scenes/characters they are training it on.

[–] isgleas@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's see how crappy upcoming Hallmark home video xmas movies will be

Oh, wait

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

A standard Hallmark movie, but it keeps getting increasingly unhinged and disjointed. Could be a masterpiece… or more likely just trash as you’d expect.