Can someone explain how this wouldn’t violate the first amendment? I don’t understand the reasoning behind it.
this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
25 points (93.1% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2903 readers
714 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The reasoning is "we don't like freedom of religion and want a judge to agree with us regardless."