73
submitted 1 year ago by Mex@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheLurker@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

TL:DR

Law totally not in response to Council Woman Karen's shithead poodle who she lets run around the streets without a lead trying to attack a group of 7 dogs being walked together and having its dumb fluffy fucking arse handed to it.

Trust us we asked Karen's friends and they all agreed more than 6 dogs being walked together is the problem.

[-] nxfsi@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago
[-] TheLurker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The gigachad is real. 🤣

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

He argued dog owners with fewer dogs were often less able to control them.

...

"Two Labradors came over that were totally out of control, whereas we noticed in the corner of the field there was a man on his own with about 25 beagles. Those beagles did not move."

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

Can we do something about the man dragging 25 dead beagles through a field?

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

illegalbeagle

[-] tal@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Those beagles did not move.

Beagles were bred to trail animals.

Labrador retrievers were bred to go after birds that get shot out of the sky.

You have a bunch of balloonists land what's basically the world's biggest bird in a field and the Labradors go bonkers and the beagles don't care.

I feel like all parties involved probably acted about as one might expect.

[-] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of beagles.

[-] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 15 points 1 year ago

What an odd ban. Do they have any evidence that commercial dog walkers (as those with lots of dogs are likely to be) are responsible for the increase?

[-] eendjes@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago

They likely must have some statistics. But if I had to do an uneducated guess, I would guess it’s also due to poorly socialized dogs from lockdown time. Not that it’s mutually exclusive.

[-] merridew@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For everyone saying this seems random/odd/pointless/in response to some Karen etc:

February 2023: Dog walker mauled to death by dogs at Surrey beauty spot

The dog walker, from Croydon, died after suffering massive blood loss caused by multiple bites to the neck in Gravelly Hill, Caterham, on January 12, while she was out with eight dogs.

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/first-pictures-of-natasha-johnston-dog-walker-mauled-to-death-by-dogs-at-surrey

Which I suspect may have some bearing on this announcement.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

That was Surrey. This is North Somerset.

[-] merridew@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, I forgot that councillors don't read newspapers. There's no way a councillor in North Somerset could have been aware of this attack in Surrey, as reported in the national papers.

[-] Solaris1789@jlai.lu 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oi oi oi got yo dog walkin loicense bruv????

[-] Rayspekt@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry officah, I just happen to have my hands full with too many bitches. I just can't help it, officah.

[-] ymhr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yet still nothing about Bully XL…

[-] CryptoRoberto@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The assholes who raise vicious bad dogs will just move onto another breed. You can't legislate being a good dog owner.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Just keep banning the dangerous breeds

[-] aport@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe they'll move to raising bad pugs and nobody will get mauled to death anymore?

[-] gerdesj@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Did anyone actually read the article:

"The ban - which covers all spaces in North Somerset open to the public".

I live in South Somerset (Yeovil) but since the county went even more bizarre and decided to amalgamate into some mad centralised Somerset County thingie instead of the old Somerset regions. who knows what this ruling even means?

@mex@feddit.co.uk - fix the title to note coverage only applies to North Somerset (whatever that is). It's shitty to imply something that doesn't apply to the vast majority of a county, let alone the country.

[-] Mex@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

The title is the title from the BBC I am not editorialising it.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

It's from a BBC local site, which is entitled to assume that readers know which section they're in. You need to add context or it just becomes misleading clickbait.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Council leader Mike Bell said a public consultation showed "strong support" for the plan.

The move comes after dog attacks in North Somerset reportedly rose from 385 in 2020 to 480 in 2023.

"There will be exceptional circumstances and we will need to keep that under review in terms of the operational realities," Mr Bell said.

But Portishead South councillor Peter Burden said the rule was "a step too far," adding the council already had powers to make people put a dog on a lead.

"Two Labradors came over that were totally out of control, whereas we noticed in the corner of the field there was a man on his own with about 25 beagles.

The council said more rules for dog owners could soon be implemented to cover specific places in North Somerset.


The original article contains 289 words, the summary contains 134 words. Saved 54%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

This just seems random

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
73 points (96.2% liked)

United Kingdom

4033 readers
27 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS