this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
6 points (80.0% liked)

Anarchism and Social Ecology

2032 readers
1 users here now

!anarchism@slrpnk.net

A community about anarchy. anarchism, social ecology, and communalism for SLRPNK! Solarpunk anarchists unite!

Feel free to ask questions here. We aspire to make this space a safe space. SLRPNK.net's basic rules apply here, but generally don't be a dick and don't be an authoritarian.

Anarchism

Anarchism is a social and political theory and practice that works for a free society without domination and hierarchy.

Social Ecology

Social Ecology, developed from green anarchism, is the idea that our ecological problems have their ultimate roots in our social problems. This is because the domination of nature and our ecology by humanity has its ultimate roots in the domination humanity by humans. Therefore, the solutions to our ecological problems are found by addressing our social and ecological problems simultaneously.

Libraries

Audiobooks

Quotes

Poetry and imagination must be integrated with science and technology, for we have evolved beyond an innocence that can be nourished exclusively by myths and dreams.

~ Murray Bookchin, The Ecology of Freedom

People want to treat ‘we’ll figure it out by working to get there’ as some sort of rhetorical evasion instead of being a fundamental expression of trust in the power of conscious collective effort.

~Anonymous, but quoted by Mariame Kaba, We Do This 'Til We Free Us

The end justifies the means. But what if there never is an end? All we have is means.

~Ursula K. Le Guin, The Lathe of Heaven

The assumption that what currently exists must necessarily exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking.

~Murray Bookchin, "A Politics for the Twenty-First Century"

There can be no separation of the revolutionary process from the revolutionary goal. A society based on self-administration must be achieved by means of self-administration.

~Murray Bookchin, Post Scarcity Anarchism

In modern times humans have become a wolf not only to humans, but to all nature.

~Abdullah Öcalan

The ecological question is fundamentally solved as the system is repressed and a socialist social system develops. That does not mean you cannot do something for the environment right away. On the contrary, it is necessary to combine the fight for the environment with the struggle for a general social revolution...

~Abdullah Öcalan

Social ecology advances a message that calls not only for a society free of hierarchy and hierarchical sensibilities, but for an ethics that places humanity in the natural world as an agent for rendering evolution social and natural fully self-conscious.

~ Murray Bookchin

Network

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
mambabasa@slrpnk.net
Five@slrpnk.net
punkisundead@slrpnk.net
6
Basic Principles of Deep Ecology by Arne Næss and George Sessions (theanarchistlibrary.org)
submitted 3 weeks ago by SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/anarchism@slrpnk.net
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solo@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't really followed deep ecology but to my understaning there is a lot of room for criticism. At least for the past? Idk how things are today on this topic. Anyways, the following article written in 1989, meaning a few years after the one posted. It is a harsh criticism on this movement but a well founded one imo.

Social Ecology versus Deep Ecology: A Challenge for the Ecology Movement by Murray Bookchin

Let us face these differences bluntly: deep ecology, despite all its social rhetoric, has virtually no real sense that our ecological problems have their ultimate roots in society and in social problems. It preaches a gospel of a kind of "original sin" that accurses a vague species called humanity---as though people of color were equatable with whites, women with men, the Third World with the First, the poor with the rich, and the exploited with their exploiters.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Well if Bookchin says smth, I listen. Having said that I still do think the vagueness of deep ecology has value, particularly in the existing political atmosphere.

I feel as if the critique kind of takes us off course from an important discussion, unless there's a better alternate. (Which there just might)

Perhaps I'm being too defensive but I feel the finger wagging is unnecessary when it comes to the topic by Bookchin. But I'm not very well read regarding the history of this topic.

Gonna go do some research now