I’m going to guess the whole thing was written by an LLM, based entirely on how the make up fake citations all the time
New York Times gift articles
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
So scientific fraud then. Will anyone be punished for it though?
Of course, the shitbags will use it as an example of how academia is flawed so they can justify even more cuts to the sciences and education.
Because of course it does.
Gross incompetence.
As soon as there’s fake citations you’ve lost me that you’re trying to do this for the greater good or that you truly believe it. If you actually believed it to be true you would use real citations. I just don’t understand what the fucking point is though? What is the problem these guys have with vaccines to the point where they are willing to lie to get people to stop getting them?
Best guess I can come up with is that they're eugenicists who think others are weak and deserve to die.
Yeah. I just thought RFK from what I know about him was that he was just well intentioned but stupid. Guess I was wrong.
Nobody that needs to know this will hear it, and even if they do they won't believe it.