this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
150 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

904 readers
55 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I’m going to guess the whole thing was written by an LLM, based entirely on how the make up fake citations all the time

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago
[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So scientific fraud then. Will anyone be punished for it though?

[–] Bad_Engineering@fedia.io 12 points 6 days ago

Of course, the shitbags will use it as an example of how academia is flawed so they can justify even more cuts to the sciences and education.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Because of course it does.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Gross incompetence.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As soon as there’s fake citations you’ve lost me that you’re trying to do this for the greater good or that you truly believe it. If you actually believed it to be true you would use real citations. I just don’t understand what the fucking point is though? What is the problem these guys have with vaccines to the point where they are willing to lie to get people to stop getting them?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Best guess I can come up with is that they're eugenicists who think others are weak and deserve to die.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah. I just thought RFK from what I know about him was that he was just well intentioned but stupid. Guess I was wrong.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Nobody that needs to know this will hear it, and even if they do they won't believe it.