this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
723 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

8287 readers
2439 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

If you haven't learned by 40 that all cordless vaccuums are terrible, then you're beyond help.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

An important thing us people at 40 have to keep in mind is tech advances and gets better all the time. The cordless vac I have now works great for being portable and usable in our townhouse, which has no carpet.

Would a good corded vacuum be better? Depends on the terms. It'll be better max performance, bit I don't have to lug a heavier vacuum upstairs to clean stuff in my room, and what I have works.

As a photography hobbyist, it's like saying why take a picture with a phone camera, m43, or apsc when you could use full frame or medium format? The cameras are objectively better quality pictures, but they are more expensive and larger, especially when it comes to lenses. Sometimes convenience is "better."

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Kudos for a great argument. I completely agree that in some cases a cordless will suffice. But in general I feel they all are terrible and at some point become disappointing. Guess I just have a lot of need for something that eats carpet for breakfast.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

We have a good one. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] DrVanNostrand@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

That's a symptom of early onset Republican as well.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Cord management is such a big part of vacuuming to me I don't think I would be very excited about a cordless vacuum. It would just be missing part of the experience for me.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The jokes on you. Vacuums have been exciting me since I was 14. /S

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Our 50 year old Kenmore central vac will probably outlast me. Guess I'll have to find something else to get excited about.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Have you considered a cordless drill or jigsaw?

[–] spykee@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Fuck yeah!
Did anyone see the new Dyson stick?\

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 2 points 3 weeks ago

It would excite me more if I could afford a place big enough to feel like owning one would be a necessity. My small dustbuster is enough (which is a cordless vacuum, technically).

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

You mean a robot vacuum?

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Somehow I read "execute" and had fully accepted my fate before I realized it said "excite"

[–] TheCynicalSaint@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

23 here and this has always excited be.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm 39 and I'm just happy when I'm regular for two week stretches.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

hell, i get excited over new cutlery and plate sets. am i old? yes, yes, i am.

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, but it's THE WIDTH OF A 500 YEN

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›