this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
473 points (99.0% liked)

World News

47448 readers
2474 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia will take years to replace nuclear-capable bomber planes that were hit in Ukrainian drone strikes last weekend, according to Western military aviation experts, straining a modernisation programme that is already delayed.

Satellite photos of airfields in Siberia and Russia's far north show extensive damage from the attacks, with several aircraft completely burnt out, although there are conflicting versions of the total number destroyed or damaged.

The United States assesses that up to 20 warplanes were hit - around half the number estimated by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy - and around 10 were destroyed, two U.S. officials told Reuters.

(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

The US says it's 20, and in their new capacity as an official mouthpiece for the government of Russia, you can be sure that means it's 40. Maybe more.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meanwhile in Afghanistan:

Come in Donkey 1! Donkey 1 kanoby?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

Soldier: Sir, Donkey 1 released! But the target is moving!

Did the carrot targeting system get installed on the target?

Soldier: Installed? I mean I put the carrots in the back of the trunk sir, as you told me!

Well done! Our work here is...bang!!!.....shit, what did you do with the other carrots?

Soldier:....

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At this point they might as well buy them from China.

Although it’s arguable whether it’s worth having strategic bombers anymore. If they only need a platform to launch cruise missiles there are over platforms that can do it.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

is the ccp even willingly to give them this much tech. also ccp might already got what they want out of the deal with russia some time ago. inroads into sibera for natural resources, buying thier oil at low prices.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I mean they’d just be replacing decades old planes anyways. When was the last time anyone came out with a new strategic bomber anyways? I guess stealth bombers but China doesn’t even have one.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›