this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
309 points (99.0% liked)

World News

47663 readers
3734 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rxbudian@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Isn't Austria's military service age lower than 21?
They can just join military and access guns there

[–] ximtor@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago

The thing is, this is mostly reactionary politics. They do this because it's easy and they can say "see we did something, gib vote".

Instead phsychological care is being reduced, which would be way more valuable in the long term.

I am not saying gun laws are bad, just that they don't pose that much of a problem in Austria if it weren't for psychological issues. Not to speak about alcohol, unrelated to the shooting but ffs thats an issue nobody touches because "culture"-_-. I just mention this because regulating this properly and/or providing psychogical care for alcohol problems, or even aknowledging that it IS a problem, would go way further in preventing harm and accidents.

Not as interesting of an issue of course, no outrageous headlines to be made that don't negatively impact politicians..

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I bet the kid was American /s

I'm glad to see a country do more than ask pointlessly, "what else can we do?"

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 1 points 13 hours ago

No the guns weren't as fetishized. On the other hand in the first half of the 20th century large bits of Europe had been occupied by the Germans twice. The idea that you wanted to be armed in case of a foreign invasion happening was a lot stronger, and more well founded, than the wettest dream of a 2nd amendement lover. Lots of people had been in the armed resistance and a lot of those who had not wished they had had the opportunity.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cars are much safer than they used to be, so why get trucks and SUV instead as these are exempt from a number of car safety requirements (like crumple zones) in the US. They have a likelihood of causing fatal unjuries when they collide with other cars and pedestrians that is 8 times higher than the average sedan, according to a UK study. Due to their size, weight and bad visibility for obstacles close by, they are also much more likely to crash into stuff.

[–] bystander@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, I would love North America as a whole not need to rely on cars as much as we do now. This involves building walkable neighborhoods and investment in public transit. But the car lobby is not going to let that happen. Same with the gun lobby in the US.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It can be done. Europe as a whole was on its way to become as car centric as the US back in the 1960's. People seriously revolted against that, most strongly in the Netherlands which is why it has such nice bike infrastructure.

We got gun laws because after WW2 Europe was full of guns, they were everywhere and it was untenable. So we got our shit together and did something about it.

[–] bystander@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

That's good information. It does sound like the backlash happened before large scale car friendly infrastructure got too ingrained. That's likely an easier pivot earlier on. And curious if guns were as fetishized culturally as it is in the US?

I still think industry financial interests are still the biggest roadblock to any meaningful change. In the US especially, where profit comes before well being, almost all of the time.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

Oh, Austria!!

I always confuse Austria with Baluchistan!

[–] Jolly_Platypus@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago

Look, everyone! A rational response!

What? You were expecting thoughts and prayers?

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (31 children)

Wait what? Rapid policy change in response to gun violence?

Good job ~~Australia~~ Austria!

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 72 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Austria lol. Mozart, not kangaroos.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Schwarzenegger, not Satan.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Australia also had a pretty strong reaction when it happened there.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Arthur_massacre_(Australia)

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I'll toss this on the mountain of proactive things other countries are doing that the U.S. isn't.

load more comments
view more: next ›