askchapo

Not gonna "dox" myself by giving out where i'm from, you can probably surmise it from my post history if you really want to know. My country doesn't have that large of a pro-Palestine movement, not to say there isn't one, there is. Just not on the same scale as neighbouring states. Our largest military trading partner in terms of imports is Israel. the total value of the arms and munitions we purchase from them is around 30-50 million a year and ever increasing as we further militarize to fight against the evil Russians. I know legalism will never work and it will be impossible to halt the import of weaponry through those means but it is good grounds for protest as the ones we see against Elbit abroad. It would be a good way to galvanize opposition to the genocide and Israel in general here as we are dominated by the same kinds of liberals and conservatives which love to couch their rhetoric with legalistic justifications. You hear constant whinging (rarely justified) about breaches of international law in countries that to do not align with the western interest. We are dominated by this kind of liberal monoculture and thus it would be easier to broach the subject with the same kind of framework than without it. The problem is i'm not well versed in international law and would not know how to properly formulate that type of argument, it's like a whole different language to me. I don't know where to even start.