this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8192 readers
510 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stephen@lazysoci.al 12 points 1 day ago

“Republicans forced to” seem like a good start to many possible sentences.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 1 day ago

While Lee claimed the land could be used to address the need for affordable housing, critical observers saw the proposal as merely an effort to pay for tax breaks under Trump. And, under the plan, there would have been “no significant guardrails to prevent valued public lands from being sold for trophy homes, pricey vacation spots, exclusive golf communities, or other developments,” according to the Center for American Progress.