this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
105 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

73190 readers
4121 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] StowawayFog@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

It will just get Chinese engineers H1-B visas and bring them to America instead. Problem solved.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 days ago

Outsourcing your Defense Department to a foreign country is a choice. Not a smart choice, but a choice nonetheless.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

What Microsoft did was absolutely inexcusable.

But, really, not just for this alone.

As for the DoD enlisting Microsoft, given the latter's decades-spanning horrible reputation, I don't know what to say.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago

Great. Next can we stop using Microsoft for defense department computer systems?

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I never would never have expected them to be using China based engis on defence systems thats wild. No wonder they got cooked by salt typhoon.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

If a for profit firm does something illogical the answer for why is always that it pleased shareholders.

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

They wanted to save costs, but cheap was expensive.