this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
258 points (98.9% liked)

Games

20555 readers
193 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blobchoice@feddit.uk 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To be honest, when this story first appeared especially with Valve being the ones to announce the censorship, I thought it was sort of a nothing burger with Valve (Gave Newell having libertarian values) being pissed that someone has control over what they can sell on their store or not.

I also personally believe in the past 5-10 years that there is so much adult content and so much gateways to adult content in non adult content spaces that I personally feel something needs to be done about it.

But after seeing the group behind it, it's basically the opposite extreme. We should be able to talk about sex and sexuality, and have media that dives into these topics without some of the extreme fetishism that is on the internet (e.g. cuckoldry, gooning).

While I feel conflicted about these games being on an extremely popular pc gaming store, the people who are trying to get it removed aren't helping - they are the problem by being so extreme in their views of sex and sexuality themselves.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 5 days ago

without some of the extreme fetishism that is on the internet (e.g. cuckoldry, gooning)

What's wrong with those?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago

Where is this stage in the “first they came for” poem?

[–] root@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago

What's next? Are they going to try to remove The Last of Us ? :/

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago

GabeN has "fuck you" money. He doesn't need to kowtow to these uptight fucks

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 107 points 1 week ago (5 children)

From Wikipedia about NCOSE

The National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), previously known as Morality in Media and Operation Yorkville, is an American conservative anti-pornography organization. The group has also campaigned against sex trafficking, same-sex marriage, sex shops and sex toys, decriminalization of sex work, comprehensive sex education, and various works of literature or visual arts the organization has deemed obscene, profane or indecent. [...] The organization describes its goal as "exposing the links between all forms of sexual exploitation".

Doing the lords work by fucking up (lol) any discourse about sexuality.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

A thing about how the group's goals are contradictory: Sex education is probably the best tool to protect children from sexual exploitation. So stopping sex ed aids child molesters, by making it easier to manipulate children.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

It's very weird to see "decriminalization of sex work" in there though. Because that's extremely progressive. (And positive in my eyes.)

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"campaigning AGAINST"

they're against that...

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Oh I see thanks.

[–] HearTwoTalk@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

They're against decriminalizing it

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can agree with exactly ONE thing on that list which is worth campaigning against and that's sex trafficking. However, given that this lot voted in a fucking pedo rapist as the supreme leader of their country, I doubt their conviction.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Generally, the "sex trafficking" these types of groups campaign against is the non-existent QAnon variant, where those people are somehow trafficking millions and millions of (white suburban) kids into sex slavery in those countries for more of those people.

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminds me of enforcing the identification of all internet users for the sake of "protecting the children".

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Which actual criminals can circumvent, and takes away anonymity from children, which is by far the best protection for them. So yeah, if you want to protect children, this is a serious step back.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You can still identify children online. A/S/L never fails

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Reminds me of the Omegle zombie survival game:

  1. You have six shotgun shells.
  2. Connect to a random person.
  3. If they ask "ASL", they're a Zombie. If you have a shotgun shell left, you shoot them and use up one shell. If not, they bite you and you die.
  4. Ask "What is OP?". If they give the correct answer, they're a fellow survivor, and both of you refill your shotgun shells.
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 week ago

Because fucking of course they're fascists. Of course.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago

comprehensive sex education

Ah yes, because if there is anything that will prevent exploitation it’s not being educated about sex.

[–] Metostopholes@midwest.social 68 points 1 week ago

Ah, I thought it was strange for the payment processing companies to come out of nowhere.

Them being pressured by conservative prudish assholes masquerading as concerned feminists makes more sense.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

HuniePop is a comedic masterpiece I will actually be upset about if it's disappeared.

This group is nuts. Wanting to ban Detroit Become Human because it depicts child abuse is completely insane. That's like solving sex trafficking by making it illegal to mention it.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 days ago

I mean, their leader is literally under fire for saying the Epstein files never existed and people should just stop talking about it. Making it illegal to even mention sex trafficking is the next logical step to protect the Dear Leader, because lord knows tackling the real issues wouldn't end well for him.

It's actually a more ideologically consistent position than most reactionary groups. They want to be able to keep diddling kids while everyone shuts up about it and the queers get shoved in concentration camps. Now that's a Good Traditional Christian Nation babyyyyyy

[–] lath@piefed.social 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Doubt they want to solve it. More like make it out of sight, out of mind.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

This is exactly their goal. They don't wanna solve it. They don't want to make things better. They just want it to not be talked about or discussed or thought about. It's the same as your landlord painting over a patch of black mold.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is there no aspect of life that isn't being completely shit upon and ruined by conservatives?

[–] shani66@ani.social 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No. They are anti-human, straight up.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 5 days ago

anti-human

Don't insult anti-humans. Conservatives are anti-fun.

[–] duchess@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You mean Christmas dishes you woke commie /s

[–] duchess@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago

I say Christmas dish even if its Easter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Well, that's new: usually when I need the archived article it's because the original was paywalled, but this time the original seems to have been deleted completely. Is Vice getting censored too now?

[–] misteloct@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Because VICE went bankrupt. Surprised their website is running at all.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›