this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
3 points (71.4% liked)

MTG

2243 readers
13 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm just asking questions.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lore-wise, probably. Gameplay-wise, it'd be like having a vehicle without crew, or an equipment without a way to equip it. Both are technically valid (and those vehicles/equipment can still become creatures/equipped through other means), but it would end up just confusing the player for a little bit of flavor.

Design-wise, saddle is neither evergreen nor deciduous, so it would have needed to become a primary mechanic of the set for them to add saddle. Definitely a design direction they could have gone (make all the chocobos into mounts and build them that way), but they seem to have preferred landfall for some reason instead.

[โ€“] lorty@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

The landfall is meant to represent moving around the land.