502

I know they allow scam adverts because it's easy money, but why aren't they held responsible for facilitating obvious scams? You open Edge, there's 3 "Earn money quick" adverts. On Instagram, every 5 ads, one is a scam.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Simmy@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PR_freak@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

It is the law's job to prevent and stop scams not of the platform that provides the advertising

If I had a printing shop (not sure how is it called in English) should I be the one who checks that what is written on the handouts is legit? Heck no, I don't have the means for that.

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I agree with that in general but think that the scenario changes when you KNOW that you're doing business with scammers.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes.

Any service you offer professionally should absolutely be reviewed for legality. If you didn't have the means to comply with laws and regulations you shouldn't be in business.

And in the case of lots of these ads with malware, it would be like you printing poison ink on handouts, and saying you aren't to blame.

[-] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Then why my ad for cocaine and hookers was taken down 😤

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] blazera@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Googles been supporting Prager U for many years

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Because they are not making the adverts. That is it. As they are not the creator they won't be held responsible.

[-] Polar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

So I guess it's okay to distribute CP, because you aren't the creator, therefore you're not going to be held responsible.

[-] PR_freak@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

According to the law you are required to remove it as soon as you know it is there, but if you are not the original uploader you are not going to be held responsible

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

If I received financial compensation to promote a Ponzi scheme I would be held accountable.

[-] PR_freak@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It is the law's job to prevent and stop scams not of the platform that provides the advertising

If I had a printing shop (not sure how is it called in English) should I be the one who checks that what is written on the handouts is legit? Heck no, I don't have the means for that.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

In this case the company selling ad space isn't the print shop they are the man handing out those handouts. They receive money from the scammers for directing people to these scam websites, money that is the profits of those scams.

(People will understand what you mean if you say printing shop. As a native English speaker I normally hear it said as just print shop, but printing shop works.)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
502 points (97.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35870 readers
686 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS