Ruining both.
Firefox
The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Related
- Firefox Customs: !FirefoxCSS@fedia.io
- Thunderbird: !Thunderbird@fedia.io
Rules
While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.
Rules
-
Always be civil and respectful
Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity. -
Don't be a bigot
No form of bigotry will be tolerated. -
Don't post security compromising suggestions
If you do, include an obvious and clear warning. -
Don't post conspiracy theories
Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources. -
Don't accuse others of shilling
Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate. -
Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.
I truly feel that Mozilla is in danger, as their inability to modernize fast enough when other browsers did...Left them with a smaller market share after all said and done. AI is a losing bet, that will bring them ruin. Sucks to suck, I guess (sucking on the teat of Google instead of seeking better, ethical funding).
At least Firefox will live on in forks, a direct blessing of open source projects. The good shit can be preserved and the cursed stuff can be cut out!
IIRC, the devs of at least one of the forks - thought I forget which - have said they'd be forced quit if there was no upstream Firefox to constantly rebase from.
I wonder how many of the forks (or rather, their dev teams) would be able to handle the load of becoming 'The Main Project' if Firefox-proper went away.
That's what I wonder as well...As they do need material to rebase from. I don't know of many teams that might be able to handle that level of commitment and expense (lets be real, it's costly to create and maintain a browser). Some of the forks have small teams, so I expect that there will be a lot of project deaths as a direct result of Firefox losing Mozilla constant support. Realistically, if Mozilla gets KO'd, nobody outside of a bigger company could ever hope to develop and maintain Firefox.
If Mozilla is in danger because they're not modernizing fast enough, then Firefox forks without Mozilla providing core updates will fall even farther behind.
Not to mention that adding AI features is part of that modernizing. I know it's a common refrain around here that "nobody's asking for AI" but that doesn't seem to actually be the case given how much actual demand there is for AI tools and services. If Firefox doesn't add these features that means they're handing that entire market over to closed-source browsers voluntarily.
I am specifically talking about the point in the early 2000's when Mozilla was behind when other browsers were stepping up their game. I don't consider implementing AI features a modernization attempt, that's just chasing a trend that big corps are trying to gaslight end users into adopting. Given the pushback and dislike of AI in general, it would be smarter for them to cater to users that don't want it. Which is why I use Vivaldi which is proudly against using AI until it can be ethically implemented (due to the current implementation, never).
Fucking itself and the web
Saving neither, is my feeling.
Back when Mozilla was building Firefox to save the web, Mozilla was actually producing a product that people could use that did what the big bad companies were pushing. This time around, Mozilla is just selling our eyeballs to the big bad companies while jawboning about how virtuous they are.
blame fucking google
More like antitrust laws, or lack of them.
Why not both? (I know lots of folks will hate this take, but please hear me out.)
Because let's be real: AI is not going away. Yes, we're all waiting for the AI bubble to bust. And I really want it to, these companies are getting so terrible. But when it bursts, AI isn't going to disappear. It will condense down to a few companies, or even just one. Do you want one company controlling all the AI out there? Controlling all the answers AI gives? Saying how you or others can use it?
Mozilla claims they want to develop responsible AI. They say they want to make their AI private, and work on-device. I believe we should be encouraging this, so that we don't end up with control of AI in the hands of Google, Meta, or Musk.
We need alternatives, badly. Because AI is here to stay, no matter how much we hate it. This Pandora's Box has already been opened, and things aren't going back.
Do you want one company controlling all the AI out there? Controlling all the answers AI gives?
Do you really think that there won't be multiple models even if the bubble bursts? The "best" models are from China and are open source. "We" don't control China at all! So I don't see this as likely.
Mozilla claims they want to develop responsible AI.
Put up or shut up, right?
They say they want to make their AI private, and work on-device. I believe we should be encouraging this, so that we don’t end up with control of AI in the hands of Google, Meta, or Musk.
I had no issue with the AI features in Firefox - the tab sorter and the translations, etc.
What I DO have an issue with is Mozilla turning its users into training fodder for the AI companies - instead of just building that private AI they keep jawboning about.
Do you really think that there won’t be multiple models even if the bubble bursts? The “best” models are from China and are open source. “We” don’t control China at all! So I don’t see this as likely.
There likely will be a few models remaining when the dust settles, but considering the sheer cost, scale, and power requirements of the data centers the current ones need, I could see one company buying up the rest when the bubble crashes. I don't want this to get political, but the models coming from China are incentivized to follow the government's policies regarding information control. They already answer certain questions with government sanctioned answers, or outright refuse to answer. I don't see them remaining open source for long, and their datasets even less so.
What I DO have an issue with is Mozilla turning its users into training fodder for the AI companies - instead of just building that private AI they keep jawboning about.
This is a fair concern. I don't use the AI chat bots, and I try to not use the AI answers that pop up with searches. And I refuse to use the generative AIs. But I'm a minority it seems. Thousands of people use these AIs everyday, many of them by choice. So the real question becomes, do we want them using browsers like OpenAI's new browser, that will likely mine everything they do for their datasets? Or do we want a browser that can limit what these AIs can scrape up, like Firefox?
We're losing the battle against AI. The amount of people using it keeps growing. Just look at the people using Grok to argue with each other on Twitter. Or the students getting ChatGPT to write their essays. We need to build alternatives that aren't controlled by billionaires, massive corporations, and venture capitalists. But that's going to take time. And until we get there, we should be mitigating the damage as best we can, by giving privacy-focused alternatives when using AI.
These aren't great choices. But if I have to choose between them, I'd rather back Mozilla.
So the real question becomes, do we want them using browsers like OpenAI's new browser, that will likely mine everything they do for their datasets?
What is the difference?
Or do we want a browser that can limit what these AIs can scrape up, like Firefox?
Where has Mozilla shown that Firefox in any way limits what is scraped? All I see is jawboning.
We need to build alternatives that aren't controlled by billionaires, massive corporations, and venture capitalists.
Okay. Who is doing it? Not Mozilla, clearly.
But if I have to choose between them, I'd rather back Mozilla.
Why? They are using stolen data to obviate community contributions. Your trust seems misplaced.