85

This was long overdue, and I should have made it per day when the supreme court did these cases. But oh well, it's all under one megathread. This will be active for a couple of days.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

The Roberts Court is the worst since the Taney Court. Citizens United cemented that legacy a decade ago, and it’s only been downhill from there. The question now is whether they’ll be the first openly fascist court.

And all as their various bribes are becoming public. Corrupt and evil and provably so. They took the money and sold out the rule of law.

[-] makeshiftreaper@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Of course the cowards released these decisions on the Friday before a 4 day weekend for most. I know it's common practice but moves like that make it so clear that they know they're being shitty and are trying to bury the news

[-] Eclipciz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Can someone TLDR the LGBT case? I heard something about legal business discrimination but that’s all I know.

[-] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

A Christian website designer sued so she wouldn’t have to make sites for LGBTQ+ weddings. The court said she can refuse, citing religious freedom. It was a 6-3 vote.

Also, it seems the web designer that sued basically made it all up. The designer didn’t have any same-sex clients. She didn’t receive any requests from gay couples to work on their wedding websites. But it doesn’t matter the court ruled that she can legally discriminate anyway.

[-] Fugicara@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

She was also not a web designer lol. Insane ruling by the SCOTUS, totally ignoring standing. Same issue with the student debt relief overturning. This court does not care about standing at all and is willing to throw out that most basic principle of law for the purpose of their judicial activism.

[-] Gullible@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This may create a sort of pseudoreligious legal arms race. One group will arbitrarily take away rights based on “their religion,” as has happened today, and another will attempt to recreate those rights under their own “religious” banner, as the church of satan has attempted. “Religion” will end up a focal point, regardless of the outcome, and fundamentalists win.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Which confirms that states can pose Jim Crow style laws against LGBTQ.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

A website designer refused to make a website for a gay wedding couple, citing that homosexual relationship are against their religious beliefs. The state had laws forbidding discrimination on the basis of sexuality and in a lawsuit tried to force the designer to make the website. The Supreme Court decided 6-3 that religious beliefs are more important and the state can’t force someone do do business against their religious beliefs and that doing so would be a violation of free speech by forcing someone to make speech.

[-] Mister_Haste@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's important to point out that the entire story behind the case was fabricated. There was no gay couple asking for anything. It was all garbage used to erode LGBTQ+ rights.

[-] stephfinitely@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

And the web designer doesn't even make websites for wedding. The whole thing was fake and designed to reach the supreme court and to just this.

It sure is a great thing that we have such a powerful institution standing up for the sincerely-held bigotry of those poor billionaires and businesses. History books will remember them fondly.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I almost posted a megathread as well.

[-] outrageousmatter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ah, I was maybe going to post it tomorrow but I decided tonight, we gotta emulate the original r/politics to make sure the migrating redditors feel at home.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Works for me!

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That the court threw out affirmative action on the same day it struck down student loan forgiveness... well, these things are more closely related than you might think.

Up until the Civil Rights acts were passed, state colleges were publicly funded, virtually free to students- higher education was very much seen as a public good- but while segregation was legal college was tacitly only for white people. When segregation was struck down, funding for those colleges was cut and tuition costs were shifted to students- this was explicitly about pricing poor (more to the point, black and brown) people out of colleges now that they couldn't discriminate on the basis of race.

The high cost your children will pay to go to college was never necessary, it was deliberately done to price minorities out of college

[-] queermunist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's not just about minorities, although it is about that.

This is about keeping the masses out of universities so that only children of the elite can attend and to isolate them from ever interacting with anyone outside their class. Those children are white because our elites are white, of course, but it's really a one-two punch. The goal is a consolidation of power and privilege, to ensure that anyone who goes to the "right" schools is of the "right" sort.

[-] DemigoD@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm obviously interested in politics stuff but I'm honestly currently here wondering about lemmy's politics. Does anyone know which way if any this place leans? Reddit politics obviously claimed to be neutral but by the end id say it was one of the most left biased websites on the net. Anyone know about this place?

[-] nicholas@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Lemmy is more left-wing than Reddit and FAR more unwelcoming to differing views. If you’re even slightly to the right of Bernie Sanders, be prepared to be called a “fascist” and ridiculed by bad faith users. Consider yourself warned.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Are you just slightly to the right of Bernie Sanders, or do you suspect that there is some other reason that people keep calling you a fascist?

Because if people kept calling me a fascist, I might take the hint and do some introspection.

[-] nicholas@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Ah look everybody, another one. Thanks for proving my point.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Fine. Since you evidently get called a fascist all the time on lemmy, you should be able to provide an example of it happening.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I for one love biden but hate the hard left. On PCM I was auth center. Where do I land in this site daddy

[-] queermunist@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Neoliberalism

[-] IronDonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Just started scrolling around here a few days ago myself. Based purely on the posts I've clicked from "top", so far it seems to be about as left as reddit, but in an even more angry way: Even quicker to use dehumanizing rhetoric, to jump on the "anyone who doesn't agree with me must actually be acting in bad faith" trend that has been gaining ground on reddit, and so on. And even one highly upvoted comment that said that every mention of free speech is a fascist dog whistle, which in context I think was supposed to be in support of some lefty thing, though that would enrage most lefties I know in the real world.

See how it plays out though, haven't been here long.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Liberals aren't leftists fyi

[-] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Kind of sounds like feelings are more important to you than facts.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

reddit kept the_donald around for years after they promoted and helped organize a literal nazi rally. reddit coddles the worst of what conservatism has to offer, and always has.

If that's too far left for your tastes, you will not like a community where you can't work the refs by whining.

[-] nicholas@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Great rulings all around. Lovely day for the country!

Happy 4th of July everybody.

[-] miked@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Related

John Roberts Begs the Liberal Justices to Stop Criticizing the Court

The chief justice doesn’t like his conservative Supreme Court colleagues getting called out for judicial overreach.

[-] spaysi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Roberts deserves to be remembered as the Justice who presided over this shit… the audacity of this man complaining about being criticized for checks notes decisions made that HE is responsible for as leader of the Supreme Court.

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
85 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2899 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS