Great addition !
PieFed API & mobile app dev
Announcements and discussions about the PieFed API - changes, improvements and general co-ordination between the frontend developers and the core of PieFed.
- stable docs (currently 1.2.x branch)
- development docs
@rimu I sent two reactions, one unicode and one with a custom emoji. The unicode one worked as expected, but the second one with :catjam: is not rendered properly. Also it seems to have replaced the unicode reaction.
Interesting. It shows up, but just as the shortcode:

@rimu@piefed.social - not sure what the json looks like coming from mitra, but at least in the short term it might make sense to just have piefed interpret emoji it doesn't understand as an upvote (like it had been doing up to now) so that it doesn't break the UI like this.
Also adding :catjam: might be a good ideaβit seems to be the ruling emoji of the fediverse.
Edit: I might have just missed it on account of the disco theme.
I think there can be only one reaction. I added one, clicked another, and the previous one disappeared. After adding it back the second one's number dropped
So if you give an emoji reaction thumbs-down π, it will count as a like?
Currently, yes. I'll see how this plays out with people using it before adding special cases for some emoji. There's no technical reason why not to make it downvote...
I'm holding back on it because downvotes aren't supposed to be "I don't like this" or "this makes me feel sad" like an emoji is.
It may turn out that overloading votes like this is bad. But I hope it works because choosing an emoji is already lots of clicks so I'd like to avoid a extra click for upvoting.
If you do add it to work like that, you'd need to make it abundantly clear that a thumbs-down is a downvote. Or people will accidently downvote without meaning to.
I don't think it should work like that. It'd be a good way to express disapproval without downvoting, which is desirably used for spam/off-topic/hateful content (as it is mostly used on the fediverse).
Except that reactions count as upvotes, so I don't think it'd actually be a good way to express disapproval without downvoting.
Upvotes aren't really controversial though. One assumes if you give a thumbs up or a :100: that it counts as an upvote in itself, which is fine. But many other reacts may have more abstract uses.
I would prefer it not downvote. I donβt downvote content but iβll give someone a thumbsdown if theyβre being a turd.
Yeah, i think it would be even more confusing if certain emojis counted as downvotes.
