38
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DavLemmyHav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 year ago

CEO makes stupid short-term-profit-driven decisions which ultimately fail and make the company less reputable. who could have guessed?

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

Won't the next one just do the same thing?

[-] DavLemmyHav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

yep, ‘tis the way of the ceo. being so delightfully out of touch that you make the shittiest decisions possible just for your quarterly profits to be marginally higher

[-] counselwolf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

In general, he made decisions to attempt to buy the market rather than have the best services/console.

I'm not sure if MS is going to go the good route, but they have said that their acquisitions won't be console exclusives. I've understood that consoles lose money. Selling games is where you make it. Why limit your games to a single console? We're unlikely to see incredible dominance of a console in the future. You'd just be limiting your consumer base

The point of first party exclusives is to make money from your store long term. If they make their first party titles available on other platforms, fewer people would buy a PlayStation, which means less long term royalties from store sales.

So you limit the customer base for your first party titles, but ideally you make a ton more on your store fees. That's the same reason Valve makes first party titles, to get people on Steam, not to make money from game sales.

What they should do is make a handheld that can play PS4 titles. That attracts a different demographic and keeps control of the store royalties. But they really need to make sure it works well, since it'll be competing with the Switch and Steam Deck (and similar handheld PCs).

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

MS has indicated that they will honor contracts and some promises were made to get their acquisitions through.

But everything has either been vague or outright said will be console exclusive. Bethesda is the earliest example of this, and we'll probably see more later.

PS mostly makes their console exclusives in house. Even Spider-Man (the prime example people point to) was always intended to be console exclusive by Marvel and is only as good as it is because of Playstation funding.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
38 points (93.2% liked)

Games

16599 readers
1323 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS