this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
43 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

55295 readers
795 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Severity 9.1 - Authenticated user container escape.

The latest release fixes this.

See details here

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xyro@morbier.foo 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"This vulnerability is only exploitable by an administrator or users who have exposed their Frigate install to the open internet with no authentication which allows anyone full administrative control." High, but not critical

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why you don't expose services to the Internet, especially with weak or no authentication.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why anyone would want to expose Frigate of all things to the open internet.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So they could view their cameras while they're away?

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's my use case. But my frigate-box is strictly behind firewall and I access it over wireguard when I'm away.

[–] lankydryness@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I second this. I have notifications set up via homeassistant, and if I want to view a feed I just VPN in

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are far better, more secure ways to do this. You could use a reverse proxy. You could use tailscale. You could use wireguard.

The last thing you should do is open Frigate's port to the net.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just answering the question you asked.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know, but it seemed like there was confusion about my intended point, which is that you should never expose it to the open internet. It wasn't a question I really intended to be answered since I know that was their intention. My confusion is why do that when there are secure alternatives, some of which are easier than opening a port.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Inexperience or lack of effort. I don't know any method easier than just opening the port.