this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
116 points (100.0% liked)

WomensStuff

878 readers
106 users here now

Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.

Rules…

  1. Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
  2. Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
  3. Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
  4. No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend Feminism@beehaw.org for that, but here is an escape from it.
  5. New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftQuartz@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wish I could remember (panel 2 lol) but there was a fairly comprehensive analysis of literary tropes in European folklore that put forth that the reason the "hag" was demonized is that it is a woman who is unable to provide the patriarchal definition of worth: childbirth, domestic duties, sex. To the same degree as younger women and is also a source of advice/wisdom that could fly in the face of said patriarchal definitions.

To answer the question though, literally me.

[–] LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yep! The only thing that's off for me is that I don't like gardening

[–] SoftQuartz@anarchist.nexus 1 points 10 hours ago

I'll happily do the veg growing if someone else does the cookery :D

[–] GrantUsEyes@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 8 points 2 days ago

Post menopausal women without a family to play nurse to were just “wrong” back in the day. Worse, if they dared to compete with doctors in things like midwifery.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The last one isn't a middle-aged lady problem, it's an early modern-aged lady problem.

[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nah religions were "burning witches" for centuries if not millennia. It just was just more acceptable before and better recorded in more modern ages.

[–] parlaptie@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Catholic Church doctrine at the time was literally that there's no such thing as witches, therefore you couldn't just go around hunting and burning witches. That only started happening with the emergence of protestantism.

The Catholic Church did burn heretics though.

[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Depends on how you translate the Hebrew I suppose, but it's in the Bible, in Exodus 22:18 for example. KJV: "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." Or the Wycliffe Bible in Middle English, "Thou schalt not suffre witchis to lyue."

The "witch hunt" era just repopularize the use of the term "witch", but it was specifically women who they accused of using dark magics. The Catholic Church as well as the Jewish Temples and several other religious organizations over time absolutely burned respected women they didn't like being respected. Maybe they called them the more general "heretic" term or some other word since this covers many languages across time, but it was still innocent women being murdered without a fair trial for being smart and/or not staying in their place.