It will be fascinating to see what they come up with. $50 million for just the upper stage is so expensive compared to Falcon 9. According to the numbers in the article, SpaceX can launch 3 Falcon 9s for the price of that one upper stage.
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
10 points (91.7% liked)
Spaceflight
2336 readers
14 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !spacex@sh.itjust.works
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !militaryspace@sh.itjust.works
- !space@mander.xyz
Related meme community:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
And potentially $100 mil for the 4 engine variant of the upper stage. The rumor was that the real costs were uncompetitive, but I wouldn't have guessed this much.
I like what Rocket Lab is trying with the cheap and light upper stage for Neutron. I like what Stoke is trying with the fully reusable Nova upper stake. Blue has done the opposite.
Of all the things Bezos could blow money on, I guess subsidizing launch costs isn't the worst. At some point, though, that creates a noncompetitive environment that screws over real companies trying innovative things.