A spaceshed I’d think, which sounds pretty expensive
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
23 points (96.0% liked)
Spaceflight
2336 readers
7 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !spacex@sh.itjust.works
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !militaryspace@sh.itjust.works
- !space@mander.xyz
Related meme community:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What color is the ~~bike~~space shed going to be? I vote blue.
Collapse the solar and radiators, orient for reduced drag, maybe shield the front? Then boost to a higher orbit. Aim for… 20 years?
But why? If the upkeep is getting overwhelming and no commercial operators want the parts, that's just creating a ticking time bomb out of sentimentality. I'd rather clean up space by bringing it down.
Humans are sentimental. You can park it in an empty orbit, i don’t think that’d be an issue. It’ll just be more expensive.
They have already done this study, though.
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/iss-deorbit-analysis-summary.pdf?emrc=667c97a20241b
Raising to even a 100 year safe orbit needs 20,000kg of propellant and a new vehicle that doesn't exist. I suppose that's solvable with enough budget. It would also need attitude control while raising the orbit for debris avoidance. And a crew. Getting crew to dock at 650km is prohibitive for a mix of reasons. And, even if you solve those issues, the station becomes a dead bomb in the parking orbit that could create a massive debris cloud if struck.