this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
94 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

7116 readers
26 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
94
Swans (pxscdn.com)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by LucaPero@piefed.social to c/photography@lemmy.world
 

I’m really fond of this picture, particularly the light and the perspective. Composition and cropping has been a bit challenging, I’ll gladly hear any suggestions! Hope you like it, happy exposures everyone :)

Source:

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

I really like that, it's got a lovely dreamy quality 😊

[–] KevinFRK@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nice dream.

Mmm, you want that much sky and that sort of width, so I can see why you end up with that amount of blurred stuff at the bottom to balance the sky.

It's pointless saying "Take the shot from somewhere else with a foreground that works better: the swans will be where they will be, and having the headland fade into the sea between the two swans seems right, setting the angle.

My only suggestions are to trim the bottom as much as your artistic sense allows (but I guess you've done that), and perhaps brighten and flatten it towards the photos average to de-emphasize it. Maybe vignette?

[–] LucaPero@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Ahah, thanks :)

Your first point is the key. On your suggestion, trimming the bottom would put the reflection out of the middle - which I didn’t like - and the darker color I thought helped “hiding” it a bit and balance the brighter sky. I tried vignette on this other shot, while in the post photo I didn’t want to darken the sky (I’m really not a fan of adding artificial vignetting):

I’ll for sure work on this perspective with the 45mm and longer lenses, taking into account the feedback I got here :)

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's very interesting. Feels kinda like a tilt-shift but I'm guessing just a narrow depth of field?

[–] LucaPero@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yep, was my first outing with the RF 45mm F1.2

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Too much blurry foreground hurts my eyes... less is more.

[–] LucaPero@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Thanks for your feedback :)

I wanted to achieve the dreamiest effect possible, then I thought of cropping the very blurry bottom part by going 3:4 instead of 2:3 but didn’t like it as much.