This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Techbro, now exhausted and not getting his needs met by this bullshit: “okay, here’s a list of literally everybody. Enjoy our malicious compliance.”
Ladies and gentlemen - the party of free speech!
You should know that any emails older than 180 days are considered 'abandoned' and now only require an administrative subpoena to access and not a judicial warrant.
Think your e-mails are protected by the 4th amendment? Sure, they are... but the definition of what 'your e-mails' is has been adjusted so the 4th amendment only effectively protects you for 6 months.
Not that I disbelieve you but, source please?
http://andywibbels.com/privacy-email-cloud/
Back when email was new, server storage was tiny and you downloaded your emails frequently. That's when this law was passed.
Nowadays with gmail etc... no one downloads their emails. They stay on the server forever, and government agencies are free to take them without a warrant.
How have I never heard of this? In the digital age the 4th amendment really means nothing...
Seconded. If true, my paranoia will be justified and prove to be woefully insufficient.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R41733
Section 2702 authorizes voluntary disclosure. Section 2703 speaks to the circumstances under which ECS and RCS providers may be required to disclose communications content and related records. Section 2703 distinguishes between recent communications and those that have been in electronic storage for more than 180 days. The section insists that government entities resort to a search warrant to compel providers to supply the content of wire or electronic communications held in electronic storage for less than 180 days. It permits them to use a warrant, subpoena, or a court order authorized in subsection 2703(d) to force content disclosure with respect to communications held for more than 180 days.
A subsection 2703(d) court order may be issued by a federal magistrate or by a judge qualified to issue an order under Title III.220 It need not be issued in the district in which the provider is located.
The person whose communication is disclosed is entitled to notice, unless the court authorizes delayed notification because contemporaneous notice might have an adverse impact. Government supervisory officials may certify the need for delayed notification in the case of a subpoena. Traditional exigent circumstances and a final general inconvenience justification form the grounds for delayed notification in either case:
fuck ice. tell em turd burglar said so, bitches.
I accept this solemn duty.
And the corpos will give it willingly. Good luck getting the same information from most Fediverse instances.
If the instance is in the same country, a government can much more effectively exercise leverage against some guy running a server than a publicly traded corporation with lawyers on retainer.
If it's not the same country maybe easier just to ignore.
The best case in terms of privacy is just not collecting data. Something like mullvad vpn where they don't keep the sort of records that governments ask for.
Unfortunately anti spam measures often involve collecting identifying information (like email addresses).
I mean, everything on the fediverse is public. All you need to do is scrape
That won't provide registration email address, ip, etc, those are instance only afaik
Budget-Chicken-2425 did nothing wrong
