this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
254 points (92.1% liked)

Comic Strips

22357 readers
1352 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lawrence@lemmy.world
254
New anti-bot rules (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by lawrence@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi everyone,

I think it has become clear that many bot accounts are swarming the communities. Sometimes we can’t be sure whether a specific account is a bot, but there are some clues. I will not post the clues here since they could be used by bot creators to bypass the rules.

Lemmy (the software) currently doesn’t have tools to automate moderation, so everything has to be moderated manually.

That said, I will be adding a few anti-bot rules to the /c/comicstrips community:

  • A limit of two posts per person per day.
  • Bots are not allowed. There will be heavy moderation of suspected bot accounts. If an account is identified as a bot, its posts will be deleted and it will receive a permanent ban.
  • Banned users will have their posts removed.

And thank you to everyone in the community who reports possible spammers and bots. It helps a lot.

Here is the previous post that I fixed before, which contains a few discussions about this subject: https://lemmy.world/post/42127013

Do you have any comments or suggestions? I’m listening.

(This is not the future that Asimov expected.)

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] new_otters_raft@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Would it be possible to slowly build a whitelist for users that you confirm are legitimate?

For context, I subscribe to web comics through RSS feeds, and sometimes I'll sit down to look through the feed and then schedule out posts for the few good ones. I can totally keep it to the 2 posts per day limit, but I'm worried that I might forget one day in the future. It's hard to keep track of community specific posting rules 😅

I totally understand if the extra posts get removed, this is more about not getting banned by an automated system.

[–] UnGlasierteGurke@feddit.org 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • A limit of two posts per person per day.

This should probably be linked to the account age and combined with a time limit between posts of 30 minutes or an hour, as the bots I have seen usually post in quick succession.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This. If someone’s been here tor years and been a contributer I don’t think the 2-post limit should apply.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Yeah, ickplant and lady_butterfly or something like that are a couple of my favorites who post quite a bit and I'm pretty sure they're not bots (?)

[–] lawrence@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's fairly easy for a bot to post at random times. However it's possible to create a bot to check for bot behavior.

I made a few tests with bot moderation and quickly reached Lemmy.world instance limits (because the bot needs to read the posts consecutively and also get the user's public data).

When the account reaches the limit, it can't log in for a period. I don't want my account to be banned, so I will not continue trying to create moderation bots for Lemmy instances.

[–] MrKaplan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

feel free to get in touch with us if you have issues with api limits. we can't change them for individual users but we may be able to give you advice on more efficient usage.

your bot shouldn't be logging in every time it checks what is going on; it's best to persist the JWT you get from logging in and keep using it. the signup/login rate limit (which for whatever reason has the same counter) is relatively low to limit abuse, but the other endpoints should be more relaxed. you'd also have to hit pretty high request counts for us to even look at it. i recommend using a separate bot account (see bot rules).

[–] lawrence@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hi @MrKaplan. I will continue my efforts to improve my moderation bot by following all your recommendations, such as implementing persistent sessions and creating a different account for the bot, also adhering to the bot rules of the instance. Additionally, I will slow down consecutive calls to the API. Let's see how it goes. Thank you.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What are the limits? I don't think it needs to run constantly. Something that checks every few minutes would be a strong enough deterrent imo.

The bigger problem is that the user can just make his account ahead of time.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol the bots down voting all the comments is hilarious

Suck it bot-authors

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It's all me 😭. The newest one got a belly laugh out of me though, not gonna lie. I crossed out the only one that isn't a day old account.

Here's what I think is going on, since calling him out is probably the best (copy pasted from an other comment):

He is always posting divisive content. He probably downvotes certain comments and tries to instigate arguments to make Lemmy feel hostile. It's to turn people off and get them to leave imo.

[–] new_otters_raft@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Can you reach out to admins on any instance that the accounts are made on? Vote manipulation should be an easy instant ban. Putting together a list of accounts would help the instance admins figure out a pattern.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh I misunderstood this comment initially and thought you were admitting to making alt accounts to downvote but someone actually created a bunch of alts with your name to downvote you and others? Psychotic behaviour lol

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I wonder what his beef with grimy is, that's insane 😂

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do you see who voted on your comment?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A Lemmy user built lemvotes.org . Consider donating if you find yourself using it, they have a github! It's useful for finding bots.

Admins and moderators can also see, although I think moderators can only see for their community. Some instances block lemvotes, mainly .ml .

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Neat, the imposter grimy downvoted me three times, yay! Lol

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 15 points 1 week ago

This was widely seen as a good move

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Thank you! I’m so tired of seeing the same fucking dude post from a million alt accounts.

[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 12 points 1 week ago

Much thanks, appreciate all the time and effort you put in

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Amazing thank you! I was getting close to unsubscribing since new (seemingly bot) users would flood this community and my front-page as a result

edit: wow the vote counts on the comments in this thread are weird

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Is there a way to change the title or pin an automated comment to flag the post as a bot instead of deleting it? I think it's better to sensetize the community on the subjects the bot accounts target so it's easier to spot it elsewhere. I also think deleting posts also deletes interesting comment chains midway at times. I've had it happen and it's a bit frustrating.

I guess it wouldn't stop it from getting on the all feed though. I wish there was a way to lock votes or reset them.

Edit: one of the bots down voted me lol, he actually created extra accounts with my name to downvote. I guess it's his idea of taunting.

Edit: The guy is actually losing it lol. Everyone in this thread, including recent comment history for me and cannedtuna, is being downvoted by bots with my name.

[–] MrKaplan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

only the person creating a post can mark their own account as bot or change the title

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lemmy is popular enough to have bots now? Crazy.

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't get the appeal. Preparing to redirect to paid content? Just to feel cool?

[–] MrKaplan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it just takes one mentally ill person to make it their hobby to harass people on the internet

[–] AzuranAurora@piefed.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

Antiyanks comes to mind.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

He is always posting divisive content. He probably downvotes certain comments and tries to instigate arguments to make Lemmy feel hostile. It's to turn people off and get them to leave imo.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I don’t get the appeal of bots at all. I also like that Lemmy isn’t that busy or popular personally.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Bots are for script kiddies what loud af exhaust systems are for incels: a megaphone for their inadequacies. If you gotta try to be the loudest thing around, artificially, you probably don't have a lot going right in your life. Unfortunately, self-reflection requires maturity and many of those people seem to have peaked in elementary school, so it'll never change.

The fact they try this hard on a platform like lemmy is even more pathetic. I'd feel sorry for them if it made a difference. Just best to ignore them and block them than waste energy on them. If they gotta artificially win internet points to feel good about themselves, then pat their little head, give them a good job, buddy, and move on.

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’ve considered using a script to post more often, so that the quieter communities don’t seem like a wasteland. More posts= more engagement = more human posts

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I do love that I’m getting voted down for trying to make it busier to try and get more real people, because network effect is a thing. I get it, we want more actual human engagement, but some of these communities, 2 years in, have single-digit active members, on subs with 70k on That R Site.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Someone made 20 new accounts yesterday to downvote in the thread. You technically received 1 downvote.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

What, actually? To what end? It’s lemmy, literally nobody gives a shit about downvotes. What an insanely stupid waste of time hahaha

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

What, actually? To what end? It’s lemmy, literally nobody gives a shit about downvotes. What an insanely stupid waste of time hahaha

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

On Piefed, you can schedule posts, fwiw.

[–] HuePony@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago

Finally

[–] UnGlasierteGurke@feddit.org -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you could also require alt-text for every post (or at least for new accounts) because it would increase the effort to post. but that could probably discourage some users from posting and is kinda hard to check automatically.