this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
22 points (92.3% liked)

Opensource

5710 readers
273 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inari@piefed.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

I don't like where things are headed

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not long before git repos will implement Captchas for each submission.

[–] codeinabox@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

I think there's many solutions to this, including setting a minimum account age to accept pull requests from, or using Vouch.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

Oh man, what the fuck. What I really don't like about this is that you assume some sort of motivation when someone submits a PR. When they provide a feature implementation, a bug fix or a configuration change, you assume that the way things were before did not work for the contributor. That it was so problematic, that they invested quite a bit of time to scratch their own itch.

You simply can't look at a PR in complete isolation and just evaluate whether its changes are positive or not. On some level, you'll decide that, sure, if this user is better off with this change and it doesn't break anything, then might as well merge it.
But there is no user here. It's going to include pointless changes that just need to look plausible enough, so that this bot can bolster its credibility.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This happened to a project i know, suddently someone started sending a lot of PRs, and there was like 8k lines of code in one but it was clearly AI, code that didn't compiled, bullshit code, shitty PRs descriptions that screamed AI and more :/