Well, fortunately for Giuliani, this is a criminal proceeding so he qualifies for a public defender if he cant afford a lawyer.
They say only a fool represents himself, so he qualifies for that, too!
I don't know if he's quite that poor yet. Georgia only provides public defenders to defendants with a household income below two times the federal poverty line (or thereabouts, I forget the precise multiplier). That's why one of the other Georgia defendants didn't have a defense lawyer while he was being held pending bail.
That's... A little fucked up, what if you don't meet a certain quota of poor you just... Can't be represented?
Apparently? I think it's something they need to look into fixing that, especially given how low the federal poverty line is set.
could you imagine being the poor shit public defender who picked that short straw? defending murderers, rapists, thieves and cheats is one thing... defending that? He's like a pustule of hypocrisy on legs.
They don't get paid enough for that.
And whatever happens, the trumpies will blame said public defender and threaten their life.
blame said public defender and threaten their life.
I feel like Public Defender is where newly-minted lawyers get started. New lawyers that may not have much money, and don't live in a nice safe neighbirhood, making such threats very real.
Kind of surprising Rudy is still alive if he drinks as heavily as they say. His liver must be pickled and he's pushing 80.
His lawyer must have left after having to advise him that "taking the fifth" didn't mean he could take the whole bottle of Vodka with him on the stand....
Yeah I think he's only got about four seasons left in him
Luckily the crematorium is right around the corner.
Looks like he turned the other way and headed into the dildo shop.
(Seriously, of ALL the locations to pick, that had to be the funniest. Rudy is either an idiot or a comedy genius.)
Alcohol is a preservative
Sucks to be a 2bit criminal lackey.
Oh no!
Anyways.
I read today that his drinking is such a well known problem that Trump might not be able to say he was acting on legal advice from his lawyer since it was obvious his lawyer was fucked up
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News