this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

CanadaPolitics

3153 readers
13 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The video is David Doel's breakdown of the recent NDP leadership debate, and covers a lot of angles. I wanted to focus discussion on a specific element, the argument for public options, which takes up a good chunk of it, citing programs in other countries or certain provinces.

I'm not necessarily arguing that you should vote for your NDP candidate, or like any of the NDP leadership candidates. But it would be good to focus on some of the benefits (and tradeoffs) of the public option when it comes to things like telephone costs, healthcare, groceries, housing, etc.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

What is the point of a public option when the existing problems are all caused by government bureaucracy to begin with, why not just end those with regulation overhaul?

-I believe grocerys problem in Canada are zoning laws, that make commercial real estate prohibitively expensive, as their margins on grocery sales are extremely low. Look at commercial rents and the lack of mixed commercial/residential zoning in Canada, thats all passed on as higher prices.

-Telecoms are 100% government controlled, nobody can open a carrier given how wireless signals are regulated, to avoid collisions on the wireless spectrums. But margins are low at 5.5% and the stocks all suck to own, so something else has to be the cause. The huge costs we pay are likely going from citizens to the government, with the largest cost being the cellular frequency lottery held by the government, which makes it effectively a hefty tax.

-Housing is zoning, huge developer taxes that have increased thousands of percent, slow permitting, and of course the 4% annual population growth we did with bipartisan support of the Liberals and NDP. So the NDP helped cause this problem as they called anyone who spoke out against it a racist, to the detriment of the poor and the young.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I am not an NDP member, so I can't vote for the leader, nor would I really feel right doing so.

That being said, I liked the two on the right in this image the most.

McPherson sounded great to me, I liked her, she felt very clean and professional and sharp. Ashton seemed very likable too.

I get the feeling Lewis is ahead, but I hated him instantly. He just started out by throwing out "Carney is selling us all out" comments and I'm sorry but I can't stand to have two obstructionist haters who focus on party over country. It really turned me off.

Edit: Maybe I’m just one of those liberals who Lewis is not interested in bringing over, and honestly that’s okay. I would rather an NDP that has a strong baseline platform that I don’t agree with than a milquetoast party that says everything and means nothing.

And I’m totally on-side with public options, we should have that. Government should provide the baseline services people need to live and businesses need to compete.