whats the point, we've already eliminated the wildlife.
UK Nature and Environment
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net). Research carried out in the UK that affects the UK as well as elsewhere is acceptable.
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our current banner is a shot of Walberswick marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.
Surely it's worse in rural areas as it's all farmland? At least towns have parks
I have lived in 7+ rural places. All of them have had some combination of nature reserves, forestry commission woodland, recreation grounds, open access land, walkable riverbanks and, of course, the usual footpaths and bridleway network within 15 mins walk.
I really don't know how common that is but it has always been my experience.
I suppose that is probably true, but then most urban areas will also have places too. I guess just finding areas where you can't walk somewhere within 15 mins only means that there is somewhere in the UK that applies to. But it could be rather rare.
Sounds like their fix is 'tear down some buildings to put more parks in towns' but it is also solved by introducing more trams, metro trains, and better bus services, allowing people to travel to nature spots. And also mitigating the huge lack of mobility people face in english towns.