this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
35 points (97.3% liked)

Australia

4891 readers
527 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

For fucks sake.

I fucking hate all our politicians

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 0 points 4 hours ago

This one was a right move. Fuel price is in everything. Keeping it under control is right thing.

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 21 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

"Omg, fuel cost is skyrocketing"

"We could promote elec-"

"Quick! Allow cars to run on bunker fuels!"

Is Australia trying a mad-max speedrun?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 3 hours ago

You think promoting electric anything will make any difference now?

We need to open more fuel refineries here again. Like it or not, petrol and diesel aren’t going away in our lifetime. There is simply no replacement for them across the board.

[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

They're going back to the standard we had in December last year. It's not a dramatic downgrade, just more sulfur iirc.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That does make it sound better, but that change was already a more than a decade overdue

Here's the part most Australians don't know. For years, our petrol would have been illegal in almost every country we'd consider a peer. Europe hit 10ppm sulphur limits back in 2009. The United States, Japan, South Korea, Canada, China, even India all got there before us.

Global consultancy Stratas Advisors ranked Australia's fuel quality 85th in the world. We sat between Argentina and Tanzania. A 2017 Commonwealth review put us 70th globally and dead last among the 35 OECD countries.

And what are we going back to?

Air pollution causes approximately 5,000 premature deaths in Australia each year. Vehicle emissions account for a significant chunk of that figure. Research from the University of Melbourne and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare linked dirty fuel directly to heart disease, stroke, lung cancer, and asthma. Emerging studies suggest connections to Alzheimer's, dementia, and ADHD.

The annual health cost? Around $17.8 billion, with another $4.5 billion in welfare losses and lost productivity. That exceeds the national burden of obesity.

The International Council on Clean Transportation estimated that proper fuel standards could reduce premature deaths from vehicle emissions by up to 75 per cent. For years, Australian policymakers had that research sitting on their desks.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 14 hours ago

That doesn't seem like a big deal in the short term.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Similar level to "improve housing availability by freezing housing standards". Hurts the same people it purports to help.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but also nah.

The relaxed standards will cause more emissions and may reduce longevity of a vehicle.

The question is how much of each will occur, which I think is unknowable?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We do know - none. These new emission laws only came in a few months ago, so we’re just going back to what we were 4 months ago.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If the new laws weren't going to reduce emissions, why were they introduced?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

More so we know it doesn’t impact longevity of cars. Emissions have only been lowered for a few months, going back for a while won’t hurt if it helps people afford petrol.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 9 minutes ago
[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 9 points 18 hours ago

Are they going to call the cheaper fuel 'Guzzoline'?