I used to install plugins for logseq. But now I run it raw and lean into how it wants to be used.
Wizards
Post wizards
No ai art
Nonaffiliated links to more wizards
https://www.tumblr.com/wizardcave
https://jeffeasleyart.com/store/
https://davidmattingly.com/category.php?id=2517&n=Wizards
https://krasnyart.eu/searchResults.php?criteria=motive&id=2
If something supports plugins isn’t it also how it wants to be used if you install them? Overall a weird reason to restrict yourself.
Fair point. I just wonder if the ethos of the developer is being overlooked. That being said. I don't really know what obsidian's ethos is. But it's worth thinking abiut. I remember getting into Logseq and it took me a while to come around, but now that I know how it wants me to think. Ive found its better than my old method. Perhaps allowing plugins is the ethos for obsidian.
When there is official plugin support, like there is for Obsidian, my take is that there isn’t enough resources to implement everything they would want to. Not sure about logseq.
But I get your point. Sometimes one’s own habits and preferences might stand in the way of exploring a different and possibly better approach.
Logseq has plug-in support too.
Ah yeah, that's what I was trying to get at, but you said it more eloquently. 👍