this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1263 readers
5 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pretty much everyone in the word business has noticed that audio and video are kicking writing's butts in terms of getting an online audience (I am not sure in terms of influencing people in serious jobs). Ivy Astrix mentioned that our dear friends in Berkeley decided that if a camp for wordy bloggers was good, a camp for short-form vloggers would be even better. The camp is about AI doom, but the vlogs don't have to be. You can live in Berkeley for a month, be paid $2,000, compete for $20,000 in prizes, and hang out with ~~illustrious figures~~ Hereticon alumni like:

  • Botez Sisters (professional chess and poker players, one of them is down on the idea that teh men have better genes for chess than women)
  • Grimes
  • CJ the X
  • Aric Floyd
  • Liv Boeree
  • Quinn Finite who dual-classes in visual social media and sexy social media
  • Zoe Curzi
  • Rob Miles
  • Tor Parsons
  • Yud
  • Aella
  • Nate Soares (the last three in the triangle wing, one presumes)

The marketing mentions "a sprinkling of AI experts" even though Yud's position on Twitter is that he is not an AI expert. I don't think Soares or MIles have any relevant credentials or achievements other than social media posts. Another Robert Miles was a University of Hull computer scientist. Edit/ This Miles was doing a PhD in Computer Science at the University of Nottingham ten years ago but does not mention any publications or industry experience and warns "I do have a broader understanding than some, but I also think that most researchers … yeah, most researchers know everything about one thing and a bit about everything else, and I just know a bit about everything, right?"

Some of the slogans sound lighthearted if you don't know about the phygs and the sexual abuse: "if we're gonna die we might as well have fun" "sleep is optional, posting is not" "we need better messengers" "31 days of chaos" "the stakes could not be higher"

plzdontkillus is definitely less straight and male than their usual lineup, and some of these people would be interesting to meet or have coffee with, but I would not recommend committing to spend a month with them given all the abuse and negligence in rationalist communities.

The LessWrong crowd don't seem to be worried that subsidies for streaming video are killing the culture of reading and writing and the rational, reflective, slow forms of thinking which it inculates, I don't know if they have talked about the need to cooperate with NIMBYs fighting data centers, or if using law to prevent destruction might involve hiring a law team to make OpenAI's life hell. You can hire a very good lawyer and some paralegals for Yud's salary.

edit/ added full list of celebrity guests

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ivyastrix@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They at least realize Yud's book isn't very good and no one's going to bomb datacenters with their current crop of AIfluencers.

fwiw I was DM'd once with someone saying the worst sexual abuse hasn't been made public and happens at Lighthaven, and Oliver seems to not take it very seriously. Grain of salt etc but if there's one group of people I would trust less with reporting sexual assault to than Vibecamp it would be Lighthaven.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just like EA and Rationalism are just rewarmed Christian Apocalypticism and social Darwinism, the horrors in these communities are just California cults and dysfunctional nerd groups. American FOSS, the SCA, and the skeptic/New Atheist/FreeThoughtBlogs movements all had similar stories where a community gets bigger and starts to hold parties with substances and dancing, grifters and abusers join, the older leadership does not want to deal with them, and misconduct escalates. At this point, if the leaders of an organization do not prepare for these situations, they are negligent.

[–] ivyastrix@awful.systems 1 points 23 hours ago

yep!! probably legally too

andrea and meredith from jakegate are friends of mine and I consistently look to them as examples of how to properly handle misbehaviour

[–] lurker@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The marketing mentions “a sprinkling of AI experts” even though Yud’s position on Twitter is that he is not an AI expert.

wait really? He actually said he's not an expert?

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yes he said that https://xcancel.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1642908341327499264#m

For the record, I never describe myself to the media as an expert / researcher / scientist in Artificial Intelligence; if they give me the option, I say I'm a "decision theorist" / Partially, this is because I think that's what I most feel like I actually am; notions like the reflective consistency of an agent are arguably decision-theory ones, though it's forging new ground either way. But also, I feel like it's a place where it would be easiest to defend, to my own satisfaction, and without a sense that I was even slightly misleading anyone, that I made a big damn contribution on at least the PhD level. / (Of course, sometimes the media doesn't give me that option, which is very understandable of them; and in that case, I say that I was one of the earliest and founding researchers in the field of AGI alignment. Again, seems perverse to deny that.)

It would obviously be best if Yudkowsky accepted that he has friends who love him even if he is not the smartest boy ever but I doubt he will ever make that leap.

[–] lurker@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Huh, interesting. Those slogans are also rather “interesting”

”we need better messengers”

Is he realising that showing up to a debate in a sparkly fedora and goggles is not going to make people take him seriously?

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember him wearing a suit a lot in the 2010s and looking reasonably respectable. He can, he just doesn't.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Maybe he thinks employing a weirdo facade makes people lower their guard, taking a page from Jimmy Saville.

Isn't the ability to manipulate people a defining trait of intelligence according to rationalists?

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 5 points 2 days ago

I think Yud is still trying to present himself differently to different audiences (the asinine tweets, the nerdy blog posts, the serious editorials and Old Media appearances, and the vlogs and public debates in a golden fedora). He chose to use his publicity photo in a collared shirt, short beard, and felt fedora for plzdontkillus. He told Kevin Roose that people were trying to make him look more respectable and he was resisting.

Trying to look respectable seems like it would be better strategy for a 47 year old man than pivoting to TikTok.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When I was a PhD student, I had successfully published papers in journals.

[–] aio@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In his very lukewarm defense, the rough CS equivalent to publishing a paper in a journal is presenting your paper at a conference. According to DBLP he has had three papers in AGI '06 '07 and '11 (which i would not call a serious conference) and one workshop paper (generally a tier below actual acceptance to the conference) at AAAI '15.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 3 points 2 days ago

I think Yud believes that his two decision theories are very important papers, but he can't be bothered to get them through peer review and answer the objections which academic philosophers have. Its possible that Aella will get academically published before he does, because a few academics are intrigued by her polls and she can act humble when she sees a benefit. I can imagine her letting a trained psychologist tweak her plans for a poll into something academically defensible and committee-compliant then help her with the analysis in exchange for co-authorship.

This Rob Miles might have a research record or he might have taken one semester on 'AI' at some point in his education.