this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

22760 readers
59 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

They chance the look again. I have to say, the new look looks better than the current default. But it's not for me and I will heavily customize the look anyway. Hopefully my current customization works as it is and I have nothing to do...

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

New compact mode is great, I might be in the minority here but I like the new design.

[–] Poutine@hexbear.net 4 points 4 hours ago

Every time I see a blog post with a title like this from Mozilla, I have a conversation like this in my head:

Me: You're changing the tab shape again, aren't you?

Mozilla: Today, we're announcing a new— erm, yes, we're changing the tab shape...

Me: Anything else?

Mozilla: We're centering privacy settings in—

Me: So nothing new?

Mozilla: Not really...

[–] novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 hours ago

Glad that compact mode will be officially supported again. Makes such as big difference on a laptop screen.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

eh it looks cool and all, but why do we need a redesign every 6 months?

shouldn't they be using those man-hours to like, solve the fingerprinting problem for example?

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

https://arkenfox.github.io/thorin/items/02browserfingerprinting.html

you can't "solve" fingerprinting. spoofing makes you more unique. and you cannot spoof everything. looking normal helps more than trying to hide. the only real solution to it would be creating a standard to all browsers, which is what tor does, and it's why it works. same settings, same window size, same engine, etc. if you want fingerprinting resistance, use tor!

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

the only real solution to it would be creating a standard to all browsers, which is what tor does

there you go. do that to firefox.

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

this would imply not being able to resize your window for example... you cant do that to a general purpose software. you need to useba tool that fits your needs. it would be the equivalent of complaining about Debian not being an amnesiac distro. Tails exists for this...

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

this would imply not being able to resize your window for example

Or it would let you resize and report the same size as everyone else.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

since you mention it, firefox has a feature where it launches with a generic predetermined window size so you blend in. even then screen resolution can only get them so far.

i'm not calling for firefox to be tor, just that everyday software must be more private too.

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

yes, tor uses that feature to make all users look the same, if you resize a bit your tor window that's it. you can be identified. for fingerprinting to work every browser would need to look the same. this means no extensions, no difference in window size, same settings, etc. do you think that's actually feasible for an everyday browser? really?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

i know. each point you touched can be improved upon. my point is that browsers are too transparent to third parties, and that's one of the priorities.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure I'd be okay trusting designers to solve fingerprinting.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

i'd trust mozilla to pay for developers instead of yearly redesigns.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

I hate everything about "modern design" ... Rounded corners, gradients, blur and transparency effects, fading in/out ... fuck that! I want my browser to look and feel like the rest of my UI.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

This is basically what I was thinking. I customized Firefox to be less rounded with sharp edges, single color and much denser. I don't know why every application is treated like a new abstract art (off course I'm exaggerating here).

[–] Gnergy@piefed.europe.pub 9 points 8 hours ago

oddly enough all these things have repeatedly appeared, disappeared, and reappeared in my lifetime, e.g. titlebars on Windows became transparent with Vista, then stopped being so in, I think, Windows 8?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

well, the rest of my UI has rounded corners, transparency, and blur 🤷‍♂️

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

I like some of these things, but I'd be ok with them being optional toggles. I remember seeing a Firefox fork with extensive customization options for the UI

Personally

  • rounded corners make it easier to see what is contained in what. It gives more information than just having everything meet at corners
  • gradients and blurs match the rest of my UI 😄
[–] Krafting@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

As long as Kit is used everywhere, I'm up for it