this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
158 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

85330 readers
4334 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 50 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

TLDR:

a German court has ruled that Google is liable for false statements in AI Overviews.

I'm getting pretty sick of these bots posting links to news articles without anything other than a clickbait title.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh, yeah, that's all the place has become; communities full of unsubstantial news articles for what is only substantial news a small amount of the time.

Lemmy is like 80% really shitty newspaper, 18% hollow rooms, and 2% community.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

All I can muster right now: 🚩

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 28 points 7 hours ago

B> ut the court found that, unlike traditional search engines that merely present lists of links to third-party statements, Google’s tool made “independent, new, and substantive statements” based on its own misinterpretation of links on the Internet.

That’s a problem, the court said, because while publishers may have been able to sue to stop third parties from publishing defamatory statements appearing in Google search results, only Google can correct the underlying algorithm and outputs displayed in AI Overviews. And because, at least initially, the company did not, it therefore “must be held accountable,” the court ruled. Beyond that, Google’s argument was deemed particularly weak, since the AI overview in this case “contains statements that do not appear in the search results at all.”

That's pretty cut and dry, especially for the parties that wew being incorrectly presented in the overview despite letters to Google for cease-and-desist.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 2 points 7 hours ago

The ruling isn't final.